Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 27;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01364-z.
Music therapy interventions with informal carers of individuals with life-threatening illness at pre- and post-bereavement is an increasingly important clinical area. This systematic review is the first to synthesise and critically evaluate the international evidence associated with music therapy with adult informal carers pre- and post-bereavement. Specifically, the objectives were: i) to describe the characteristics and effectiveness of music therapy interventions which aim to improve health-related outcomes for adult informal carers of adults with life-threatening illness (pre- and post-bereavement), and ii) to describe the experience of music therapy for adult informal carers of adults with life-threatening illness (pre- and post-bereavement).
Eligibility: adult informal carers of adults at end of life or bereaved; music therapy interventions for improving health-related outcomes; qualitative; mixed-method; and quantitative studies including comparators of any other intervention; published in English from 1998 onwards. Six databases were searched up to July 2022. A JBI mixed-methods systematic review approach was followed throughout, including quality appraisal, data extraction and a convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration.
A total of 34 studies were included, published between 2003 and 2022. Most were conducted in North America (n = 13), Australia (n = 10), or Europe (n = 8). No studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries or in the UK. The majority were qualitative (n = 17), followed by quasi-experimental (n = 8), mixed-methods (n = 7) and two RCTs. The majority focused on carers of individuals with dementia (n = 21) or advanced cancer (n = 7). Seventeen studies were purely quantitative or included a quantitative component. During meta-synthesis, findings were aligned to core outcomes for evaluating bereavement interventions in palliative care and previously identified risk factors for complicated grief. Commonly targeted outcomes in quantitative studies included quality of life and mental wellbeing, showing equivocal effectiveness of music therapy with significant and non-significant results. Twenty-two studies either purely qualitative or with a qualitative component underwent meta synthesis and suggested a diverse range of improved pre- and post-bereavement outcomes for informal carers across all core outcomes, and across all risk and protective factors, including psychological, spiritual, emotional, and social outcomes.
Qualitative studies provide moderate to strong evidence for improved health-related outcomes for adult informal carers of adults with life-threatening illness pre-bereavement. Limited studies including those bereaved negates conclusions for the bereavement phase. Comparisons and explanations for effectiveness across quantitative and qualitative studies are equivocal, with a high risk of bias and small samples in the limited number of quantitative studies, demonstrating a need for high-quality RCTs.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PRE-REGISTRATION: PROSPERO [CRD42021244859].
对患有危及生命疾病的个体的非正式照顾者进行哀伤前和哀伤后的音乐治疗干预是一个日益重要的临床领域。这是首次对与成年非正式照顾者在哀伤前和哀伤后的音乐治疗相关的国际证据进行综合和批判性评估的系统评价。具体来说,目标是:i)描述旨在改善患有危及生命疾病的成年人的非正式照顾者的健康相关结局的音乐治疗干预措施的特征和效果(哀伤前和哀伤后),以及 ii)描述患有危及生命疾病的成年人的非正式照顾者对音乐治疗的体验(哀伤前和哀伤后)。
合格标准:临终或丧亲的成年人的成年非正式照顾者;改善健康相关结局的音乐治疗干预措施;定性;混合方法;和包括任何其他干预措施的比较器的定量研究;自 1998 年以来以英文发表。从 1998 年开始,六个数据库被搜索到 2022 年 7 月。整个过程都遵循 JBI 混合方法系统评价方法,包括质量评估、数据提取以及综合和整合的收敛性分离方法。
共有 34 项研究被纳入,发表于 2003 年至 2022 年之间。大多数研究在北美(n=13)、澳大利亚(n=10)或欧洲(n=8)进行。没有在低收入和中等收入国家或英国进行的研究。大多数是定性的(n=17),其次是准实验性的(n=8)、混合方法的(n=7)和两项 RCT。大多数研究的重点是痴呆症(n=21)或晚期癌症(n=7)患者的照顾者。17 项研究纯粹是定量的或包含定量部分。在荟萃合成过程中,研究结果与姑息治疗中评估丧亲干预措施的核心结果和先前确定的复杂悲伤风险因素相一致。定量研究中常见的目标结果包括生活质量和心理健康,表明音乐治疗对非正式照顾者的效果存在争议,既有显著效果也有非显著效果。22 项研究要么纯粹是定性的,要么有定性部分,进行了荟萃合成,结果表明,所有核心结果和所有风险和保护因素(包括心理、精神、情感和社会结果)的非正式照顾者在哀伤前和哀伤后的健康相关结果都有不同程度的改善。
定性研究为患有危及生命疾病的成年人的非正式照顾者在哀伤前提供了健康相关结局改善的中等至有力证据。包括丧亲者的有限研究否定了哀伤阶段的结论。定量和定性研究之间的比较和效果解释存在争议,定量研究中存在高偏倚风险和小样本,表明需要高质量的 RCT。
PROSPERO [CRD42021244859]。