• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国人民解放军人员综合健康自评问卷(CHSAQ)的编制及初步评价。

Development and preliminary evaluation of the Comprehensive Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (CHSAQ) for individuals in the Chinese People Liberation Army.

机构信息

Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, the Fourth Military Medical University, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

The Medical Department, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18085-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-18085-w
PMID:38408976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895798/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is currently no widely accepted multidimensional health assessment questionnaire for individuals in the Chinese People Liberation Army (PLA). This study developed a multidimensional health survey questionnaire (Comprehensive Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire, CHSAQ) suitable for personnel in the PLA and conducted a preliminary examination of its reliability, validity, and discriminative ability.

METHODS

After 183 items from 32 dimensions were selected to form the initial version of the CHSAQ, three groups of soldiers were selected from May 2022 to April 2023 and completed three survey rounds (with 183, 131, and 55 valid items). The items were screened based on classic test theory. After screening, the final questionnaire entries were formed, the structure of the questionnaire was explored through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and its reliability, structural validity, and discriminative ability were evaluated.

RESULTS

The final questionnaire consisted of 8 dimensions and 55 items on job satisfaction, anxiety and depression, daily activities, physical function, the otolaryngology system, the integumentary system, sleep disorders, and the visual system. The total cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.648% according to exploratory factor analysis. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the normed fit index (NFI) was 0.880, and the comparison fit index (CFI) was 0.893 (close to 0.90). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.970, the split half reliability coefficient was 0.937, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.902. The results are presented as different pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Our study developed a self-report questionnaire for evaluating the comprehensive health status of personnel in the PLA in accordance with the standard procedure for questionnaire development. Our findings also showed that the CHSAQ for individuals in the PLA has good reliability and structural validity.

摘要

目的

目前,中国人民解放军(PLA)尚无被广泛认可的多维健康评估问卷。本研究开发了一种适合 PLA 人员的多维健康调查问卷(综合健康自我评估问卷,CHSAQ),并对其信度、效度和区分能力进行了初步检验。

方法

从 32 个维度中选取 183 个项目形成 CHSAQ 的初始版本,然后于 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 4 月选取 3 组士兵完成 3 轮调查(有效条目分别为 183、131 和 55)。根据经典测试理论对条目进行筛选。经过筛选,形成最终问卷条目,通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析探讨问卷结构,并评价其信度、结构效度和区分能力。

结果

最终问卷由 8 个维度和 55 个条目组成,涉及工作满意度、焦虑和抑郁、日常活动、身体功能、耳鼻喉系统、皮肤系统、睡眠障碍和视觉系统。根据探索性因子分析,总累积方差贡献率为 64.648%。根据验证性因子分析,归一化拟合指数(NFI)为 0.880,比较拟合指数(CFI)为 0.893(接近 0.90)。问卷总 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.970,分半信度系数为 0.937,重测信度系数为 0.902。结果呈现为不同的两两比较。

结论

本研究按照问卷开发的标准程序,为评估 PLA 人员的综合健康状况制定了一份自评问卷。我们的研究结果还表明,该问卷具有良好的信度和结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c8/10895798/35049decdc40/12889_2024_18085_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c8/10895798/26effeadb95d/12889_2024_18085_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c8/10895798/35049decdc40/12889_2024_18085_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c8/10895798/26effeadb95d/12889_2024_18085_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c8/10895798/35049decdc40/12889_2024_18085_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary evaluation of the Comprehensive Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (CHSAQ) for individuals in the Chinese People Liberation Army.中国人民解放军人员综合健康自评问卷(CHSAQ)的编制及初步评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18085-w.
2
Development and preliminary validation of the Dietary Self-management Behavior Questionnaire (DSMBQ) for breast cancer patients during chemotherapy: three rounds of survey.化疗期间乳腺癌患者饮食自我管理行为问卷(DSMBQ)的编制与初步验证:三轮调查
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 24;24(1):3579. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21128-x.
3
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.
4
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Chinese Preschoolers' Caregivers' Feeding Behavior Scale.发展并初步评估中国学龄前儿童照顾者喂养行为量表。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;119(11):1890-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Development and validation of a maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice scale in China.中国新生儿黄疸母亲焦虑量表的编制与验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04161-1.
8
Revision of brief health literacy assessment scale among the older adults and its reliability and validity test.老年人简易健康素养评估量表的修订及其信效度检验
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jan 28;48(1):123-129. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220011.
9
[Sinicization, cross-cultural adjustment and reliability and validity test of the Burnt Hand Outcome Tool].《烧伤手部结局工具的中国化、跨文化调适及信效度检验》
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 20;37(10):978-986. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210201-00042.
10
[Study on the applicability of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire based on classical test theory and item response theory].基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论的简易工作压力问卷适用性研究
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2024 May 20;42(5):321-331. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20231206-00144.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of the low back pain questionnaire for personnel working on islands.岛屿工作人员腰痛问卷的编制与评价
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;13:1655747. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655747. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Global prevalence of poor sleep quality in military personnel and veterans: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.军事人员和退伍军人睡眠质量差的全球患病率:一项流行病学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Sleep Med Rev. 2023 Oct;71:101840. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101840. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Suicide after leaving the UK Armed Forces 1996-2018: A cohort study.1996 年至 2018 年离开英国武装部队后的自杀情况:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 8;20(8):e1004273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004273. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Weekly cumulative extracurricular core training time predicts cadet physical performance: A descriptive epidemiological study.
每周课外核心训练累计时间可预测学员体能表现:一项描述性流行病学研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 15;9(4):e14756. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14756. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Depression and anxiety in peruvian military personnel during the pandemic context: a cross-sectional study.秘鲁军人在大流行背景下的抑郁和焦虑:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15612-z.
5
Health measurement instruments and their applicability to military veterans: a systematic review.健康测量工具及其在退伍军人中的适用性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Mil Health. 2025 Mar 21;171(2):155-165. doi: 10.1136/military-2022-002219.
6
Investigation of health literacy status and related influencing factors in military health providers of Chinese People's liberation Army, a cross-sectional study.解放军军医健康素养状况及相关影响因素的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14958-0.
7
Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults.中文成年人合理使用抗生素自我效能感量表的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13729-1.
8
Mental health consequences of military sexual trauma: results from a national survey in the French military.军事性创伤所致精神健康后果:法国军队全国调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12545-x.
9
Development, reliability and validity of infectious disease specialist Nurse's Core competence scale.传染病专科护士核心能力量表的编制、信效度研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 17;20(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00757-2.
10
Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.患者健康问卷-9 用于筛查主要抑郁症的准确性:更新的系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 5;375:n2183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2183.