Feng Yongbin, Tang Wenyu, Cheng Yajun, Zhou Xiaoyi, Wei Xianzhao
Department of Spinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
School of Nursing, Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;13:1655747. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655747. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a significant musculoskeletal disorder with multifactorial causes, affecting workforce productivity globally. Personnel working on islands face heightened LBP risk due to intensive training (e.g., heavy lifting, prolonged standing) and harsh environmental conditions (high temperature, humidity, solar radiation). Existing LBP questionnaires, such as the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index, lack specificity for island personnel's unique challenges. This study aimed to develop and validate the Low Back Pain Questionnaire (LBPQ) tailored to this population, aligning with the biopsychosocial medical model. METHODS: The LBPQ development followed a six-step process: conceptual definition, item generation, purification, dimension extraction, and reliability/validity testing. Through literature review, expert discussions, and interviews with 30 personnel working on islands, a 50-item initial scale was refined to 25 items across five dimensions: Pain Severity, Training, Daily Life, Psychological Impact, and Island Specificity. The final scale was administered to 600 personnel working on islands (experimental group) and 600 personnel working on land (control group). Reliability was assessed via Cronbach's α, while validity included factor analysis, convergent/discriminant validity tests, and correlation with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: The LBPQ demonstrated excellent reliability for personnel working on islands (Cronbach's α = 0.978) and good validity, with a KMO value of 0.967 and a cumulative variance contribution rate of 93.322%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed optimal model fit (χ/d = 1.354, CFI = 0.997, RMSEA = 0.024). Convergent and discriminant validity were superior in the island group compared to the control group. Strong correlations were observed with VAS ( = 0.675) and ODI ( = 0.824), confirming alignment with established scales. CONCLUSION: The LBPQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing LBP in personnel working on islands, addressing their unique environmental and occupational risks. It enhances clinical understanding of LBP severity and psychosocial impacts, enabling targeted prevention and intervention strategies. Future research should validate its applicability across diverse island environments and further refine its brevity.
背景:腰痛(LBP)是一种重要的肌肉骨骼疾病,病因多方面,影响着全球劳动力的生产力。由于强化训练(如重物搬运、长时间站立)和恶劣的环境条件(高温、高湿度、太阳辐射),在岛屿上工作的人员面临更高的腰痛风险。现有的腰痛问卷,如罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和奥斯威斯残疾指数,对岛屿人员面临的独特挑战缺乏特异性。本研究旨在开发并验证针对该人群的腰痛问卷(LBPQ),使其符合生物心理社会医学模式。 方法:LBPQ的开发遵循六个步骤:概念定义、条目生成、纯化、维度提取以及信度/效度测试。通过文献综述、专家讨论以及对30名在岛屿上工作的人员进行访谈,将一个50项的初始量表提炼为涵盖五个维度的25个条目:疼痛严重程度、训练、日常生活、心理影响以及岛屿特异性。最终量表应用于600名在岛屿上工作的人员(实验组)和600名在陆地上工作的人员(对照组)。通过克朗巴哈α系数评估信度,效度包括因子分析、聚合效度/区分效度测试以及与视觉模拟量表(VAS)和奥斯威斯残疾指数(ODI)的相关性。 结果:LBPQ对在岛屿上工作的人员显示出极佳的信度(克朗巴哈α系数=0.978)和良好的效度,KMO值为0.967,累积方差贡献率为93.322%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合最优(χ/d = 1.354,CFI = 0.997,RMSEA = 0.024)。与对照组相比,岛屿组的聚合效度和区分效度更优。与VAS(= 0.675)和ODI(= 0.824)观察到强相关性,证实与既定量表相符。 结论:LBPQ是评估在岛屿上工作的人员腰痛的可靠且有效的工具,可应对他们独特的环境和职业风险。它增强了对腰痛严重程度和心理社会影响的临床理解,有助于制定针对性的预防和干预策略。未来研究应验证其在不同岛屿环境中的适用性,并进一步提高其简洁性。
Front Public Health. 2025-8-19
BMC Public Health. 2025-7-30
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011-10-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-6-28
Int J Eat Disord. 2023-4
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-10-7
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017-10-18
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-7-1