• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区支持减少伤害和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。

Community Support for Harm Reduction and Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

机构信息

Center for Health and Safety Culture, Montana State University, P.O. Box 170548, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.

Leidos, Reston, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2024 Aug;49(4):724-731. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01278-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-023-01278-6
PMID:38409628
Abstract

As the opioid epidemic continues, availability of evidence-based strategies for harm reduction and treatment in communities is critical to reduce overdose and other consequences of opioid use disorder. Community members' support of harm reduction and treatment services is needed for new programs and to maintain existent programs. This study sought to understand beliefs and attitudes associated with support for three community-based strategies to address opioid misuse and addiction: naloxone, needle exchange, and medication-assisted treatment. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 545 adults. Results of the survey showed that participants supported all three strategies, with the strongest support for medication-assisted treatment. Multiple regression showed that stigma and perceived stigma were significant predictors for all three strategies, with inverse relationships. Stigmatizing beliefs predicted less support while perceiving stigma among others was associated with greater support for the strategies. Normative beliefs also significantly predicted support for all three strategies, such that stronger belief that others were supportive of each strategy was associated with greater support for that strategy. Other predictors varied across the three strategies. Support for harm reduction and treatment programs in communities affected by the opioid epidemic may be bolstered by reducing stigma and increasing normative beliefs. Stronger support for medication-assisted treatment may be leveraged and extended to harm reduction strategies. Results of our study contribute insights for bolstering community support for harm reduction and treatment, which is vital for adoption and maintenance of these important programs.

摘要

随着阿片类药物流行的持续,在社区中提供基于证据的减少伤害和治疗策略对于减少过量用药和其他阿片类药物使用障碍的后果至关重要。新的项目和现有的项目都需要社区成员支持减少伤害和治疗服务。本研究旨在了解与支持三种社区为基础的策略相关的信念和态度,以解决阿片类药物滥用和成瘾问题:纳洛酮、针具交换和药物辅助治疗。我们对 545 名成年人进行了一项横断面在线调查。调查结果显示,参与者支持所有三种策略,其中对药物辅助治疗的支持最强。多元回归显示,污名化和感知污名化是所有三种策略的重要预测因素,呈反比关系。污名化的信念预示着支持度较低,而感知到他人的污名化则与对这些策略的更大支持相关。规范信念也显著预测了对所有三种策略的支持,即对他人支持每种策略的信念越强,对该策略的支持就越大。其他预测因素在三种策略中有所不同。减少污名化和增加规范信念可能会增强对受阿片类药物流行影响的社区中减少伤害和治疗项目的支持。对药物辅助治疗的更强支持可以利用并扩展到减少伤害策略。我们研究的结果为增强社区对减少伤害和治疗的支持提供了见解,这对于这些重要项目的采用和维持至关重要。

相似文献

1
Community Support for Harm Reduction and Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.社区支持减少伤害和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。
J Community Health. 2024 Aug;49(4):724-731. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01278-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Opioid Use Disorder Stigma and Support for Harm Reduction in Rural Counties.农村县阿片类药物使用障碍的污名化与对减少伤害的支持
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(14):1818-1828. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2250434. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Community-level determinants of stakeholder perceptions of community stigma toward people with opioid use disorders, harm reduction services and treatment in the HEALing Communities Study.社区层面因素对利益相关者对社区污名化、减少伤害服务和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的看法的影响:HEALing 社区研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Dec;122:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104241. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
Evaluation of a personally-tailored opioid overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution intervention to promote harm reduction and treatment readiness in individuals actively using illicit opioids.个体化阿片类药物过量预防教育和纳洛酮分发干预措施的评估,以促进积极使用非法阿片类药物的个体减少伤害和准备接受治疗。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108265. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Concerns that an opioid antidote could "make things worse": Profiles of risk compensation beliefs using the Naloxone-Related Risk Compensation Beliefs (NaRRC-B) scale.担心阿片类药物解毒剂会“弄巧成拙”:使用纳洛酮相关风险补偿信念量表(NaRRC-B)分析风险补偿信念特征。
Subst Abus. 2020;41(2):245-251. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1616348. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
Beliefs Associated with Pharmacy-Based Naloxone: a Qualitative Study of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Purchasers and People at Risk for Opioid Overdose.与药店纳洛酮相关的信念:基于药店纳洛酮购买者和阿片类药物过量风险人群的定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2019 Jun;96(3):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00349-1.
7
Public support for harm reduction: A population survey of Canadian adults.公众对减少伤害的支持:一项加拿大成年人的人口调查。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251860. eCollection 2021.
8
Harm Reduction Strategies for the Opiod Crisis.阿片类药物危机的减少危害策略。
N C Med J. 2018 May-Jun;79(3):192-194. doi: 10.18043/ncm.79.3.192.
9
Harm reduction and recovery services support (HRRSS) to mitigate the opioid overdose epidemic in a rural community.减少伤害和康复服务支持(HRRSS)以减轻农村社区阿片类药物过量流行
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Apr 19;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00532-3.
10
A qualitative exploration of harm reduction in practice by street-based peer outreach workers.街头同伴外展工作者实践中的减少伤害的定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 30;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for the efficacy of humanizing narratives to promote support for harm-reduction policies in the United States.在美国,人性化叙事对促进支持减少伤害政策有效性的证据。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01206-y.
2
"Either way, they will use. And so, probably, would you:" A critical discourse analysis of harm reduction portrayal in United States opinion news media.“无论哪种方式,他们都会使用。所以,你可能也会:”对美国观点新闻媒体中减少伤害描述的批判性话语分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jun;140:104801. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104801. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Naloxone Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Overdose Response Among Family Members of People who Misuse Opioids.阿片类药物滥用者家属对纳洛酮的知识和对药物过量反应的态度。
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
Barriers and facilitators of naloxone and safe injection facility interventions to reduce opioid drug-related deaths: A qualitative analysis.阿片类药物相关死亡的纳洛酮和安全注射设施干预措施的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104049. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104049. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Drug Use Behaviors, Fentanyl Exposure, and Harm Reduction Service Support among People Who Use Drugs in Rural Settings.
农村地区药物使用人群的 COVID-19 大流行对药物使用行为、芬太尼暴露和减少伤害服务支持的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 16;19(4):2230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042230.
4
Does naloxone provision lead to increased substance use? A systematic review to assess if there is evidence of a 'moral hazard' associated with naloxone supply.纳洛酮供应是否会导致药物使用增加?一项系统评价评估与纳洛酮供应相关的“道德风险”是否存在证据。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103513. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Exploring first responders' perceptions of medication for addiction treatment: Does stigma influence attitudes?探索急救人员对成瘾治疗药物的看法:耻辱感会影响态度吗?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Dec;131:108485. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108485. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Association of skin infections with sharing of injection drug preparation equipment among people who inject drugs.共用注射毒品准备设备与注射毒品者皮肤感染的关联。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103198. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103198. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Stigma Reduction to Combat the Addiction Crisis - Developing an Evidence Base.减少污名以应对成瘾危机——建立证据基础。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1291-1292. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2000227.
8
Preventing opioid overdose with peer-administered naloxone: findings from a rural state.通过同伴管理纳洛酮预防阿片类药物过量:来自一个农村州的发现。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Jan 9;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0352-0.
9
Community Perceptions of Comprehensive Harm Reduction Programs and Stigma Towards People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Virginia.弗吉尼亚农村地区社区对综合减害项目的认知及对注射吸毒者的污名化
J Community Health. 2020 Apr;45(2):239-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00732-8.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative naloxone distribution strategies: First responder and lay distribution in the United States.替代纳洛酮分发策略的成本效益分析:美国的急救人员和非专业人员分发。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jan;75:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Aug 19.