UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 5150 Centre Ave. Room 1.27C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 May;25(3):421-434. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00852-5. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
With the development of effective BRAF-targeted and immune-checkpoint immunotherapies for metastatic melanoma, clinical trials are moving these treatments into earlier adjuvant and perioperative settings. BRAF-targeted therapy is a standard of care in resected stage III-IV melanoma, while anti-programmed death-1 (PD1) immunotherapy is now a standard of care option in resected stage IIB through IV disease. With both modalities, recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival are improved by a relative 35-50%, yet no improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated. Neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy improves event-free survival by approximately an absolute 23%, although improvements in overall survival have yet to be demonstrated. Understanding which patients are most likely to recur and which are most likely to benefit from treatment is now the highest priority question in the field. Biomarker analyses, such as gene expression profiling of the primary lesion and circulating DNA, are preliminarily exciting as potential biomarkers, though each has drawbacks. As in the setting of metastatic disease, markers that inform positive outcomes include interferon-γ gene expression, PD-L1, and high tumor mutational burden, while negative predictors of outcome include circulating factors such as lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-8, and C-reactive protein. Integrating and validating these markers into clinically relevant models is thus a high priority. Melanoma therapeutics continues to advance with combination adjuvant approaches now investigating anti-PD1 with lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), and individualized neoantigen therapies. How this progress will be integrated into the management of a unique patient to reduce recurrence, limit toxicity, and avoid over-treatment will dominate clinical research and patient care over the next decade.
随着针对转移性黑色素瘤的有效 BRAF 靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的发展,临床试验正在将这些治疗方法推向早期辅助和围手术期治疗。BRAF 靶向治疗是 III 期和 IV 期黑色素瘤切除后的标准治疗方法,而抗程序性死亡受体 1(PD1)免疫治疗现已成为 IIB 期至 IV 期疾病切除后的标准治疗选择之一。对于这两种治疗方法,无复发生存率和远处无转移生存率均提高了相对 35%-50%,但总体生存率并未得到改善。新辅助抗 PD1 治疗可使无事件生存率提高约 23%,尽管总体生存率的改善尚未得到证实。了解哪些患者最有可能复发,哪些患者最有可能从治疗中获益,是目前该领域的首要问题。生物标志物分析,如原发肿瘤的基因表达谱和循环 DNA,作为潜在的生物标志物初步令人兴奋,但每种方法都有其缺点。与转移性疾病的情况一样,提示阳性结果的标志物包括干扰素-γ基因表达、PD-L1 和高肿瘤突变负担,而预示不良结局的标志物包括循环因子,如乳酸脱氢酶、白细胞介素-8 和 C 反应蛋白。因此,将这些标志物整合并验证到临床相关模型中是当务之急。随着现在正在研究抗 PD1 联合淋巴细胞激活基因 3(LAG3)、T 细胞免疫受体与 Ig 和 ITIM 结构域(TIGIT)以及个体化新抗原治疗的联合辅助治疗方法的推进,黑色素瘤治疗学将继续取得进展。未来十年,如何将这些进展整合到独特患者的管理中,以降低复发率、限制毒性和避免过度治疗,将主导临床研究和患者护理。