Gen Dent. 2024 Mar-Apr;72(2):23-28.
Limited research is available evaluating whether the reported in vitro benefit of immediate dentin sealing (IDS)-namely, increased bond strength to tooth structure-can be acquired in the era of same-day (SD) dentistry. The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strengths of ceramic overlays fabricated with a delayed dentin sealing (DDS) technique or an IDS technique under 1-hour SD or 2-week multiple-day (MD) delivery conditions. Forty extracted, healthy maxillary third molars were prepared for a lithium disilicate overlay restoration and divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. In the SD-DDS group, the teeth were prepared and then stored for 1 hour in artificial saliva, and the adhesion protocol (bonding agent and resin cement) was applied at the time of delivery of the ceramic overlay. In the SD-IDS group, the teeth were prepared, the adhesive protocol was applied immediately, and the teeth were stored for 1 hour before delivery of the overlay. The protocols for the MD-DDS and MD-IDS groups were identical to SD-DDS and SD-IDS, respectively, except that the teeth were provisionalized and stored for 2 weeks prior to delivery of the overlay. Specimens were thermocycled and subjected to cyclic functional loading before they were loaded to failure in a universal testing machine using a rod resting on the buccal incline of the palatal cusp. Two-way analysis of variance tests revealed no statistically significant differences in fracture strength between the groups based on dentin sealing (P = 0.331) or delivery time (P = 0.314). The specimens demonstrated 2 fracture types; either a portion of the ceramic cohesively fractured, leaving the tooth intact, or the ceramic and part of the tooth fractured. There were no instances in which the restoration itself delaminated during fracture testing. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated there were no statistically significant differences in fracture modes between the groups. In this in vitro study, IDS did not provide a significant increase in the fracture strength of overlay restorations compared with DDS, regardless of whether the restorations were delivered the same day or after 2 weeks of storage.
关于即刻牙本质密封(IDS)所报道的体外益处(即增加对牙体结构的粘结强度)是否可在当日(SD)牙科时代获得,目前相关研究有限。本研究旨在比较在 1 小时 SD 或 2 周多日(MD)交付条件下,采用延迟牙本质密封(DDS)技术或 IDS 技术制备的陶瓷贴面的断裂强度。将 40 颗离体、健康的上颌第三磨牙制备成锂硅玻璃陶瓷贴面修复体,并分为 4 组,每组 10 颗牙。在 SD-DDS 组中,牙体预备后在人工唾液中储存 1 小时,在交付陶瓷贴面时应用粘结剂和树脂水门汀的粘结方案。在 SD-IDS 组中,牙体预备后立即应用粘结方案,并在交付贴面之前储存 1 小时。MD-DDS 和 MD-IDS 组的方案分别与 SD-DDS 和 SD-IDS 组相同,只是在交付贴面之前,牙体临时修复并储存 2 周。标本经热循环后,在万能试验机上用置于腭尖颊斜面的棒进行循环功能加载,直至标本失效。双因素方差分析显示,根据牙本质密封(P=0.331)或交付时间(P=0.314),各组间的断裂强度无统计学差异。标本表现出 2 种断裂类型;要么是陶瓷部分整体断裂,牙体完整,要么是陶瓷和部分牙体同时断裂。在断裂测试过程中,没有出现修复体本身分层的情况。Kruskal-Wallis 检验表明,各组间的断裂模式无统计学差异。在这项体外研究中,与 DDS 相比,IDS 并未显著增加贴面修复体的断裂强度,无论修复体是在当日交付还是在储存 2 周后交付。