Neutra R R
Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Oct;62:393-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8562393.
The epidemiology of diseases associated with chemical waste disposal sites has often been delayed for years after the affected community became aware of the exposure. Frequently, this has resulted in an aroused neighborhood community that is distrustful of those public agencies and officials responsible for protecting their health. It is thus important that positive steps be taken to alleviate the antagonism and to involve the community in an active and constructive role in the epidemiology study. This paper presents a case history of such an incident and highlights some of the lessons learned. The first steps were to involve and inform the community. A citizen and industry advisory committee was formed to participate in the work, publish a newsletter, and conduct regular community meetings. The newsletter and the community meetings were used to identify problems and to explain them; to describe uncertainties of a scientific as well as of political or financial nature; to involve community leaders, including those distrustful; to conduct an epidemiologic census and a neighborhood environmental exposure survey. The end results were a defusing of the antagonism toward authorities, complete acceptance by the community of the merit of the report, a higher quality of report than might otherwise have been possible, and the freedom to move toward alleviating the problems of the disposal site.
与化学废物处理场相关疾病的流行病学研究,往往在受影响社区意识到接触问题多年后才开展。这常常导致社区居民情绪激动,对负责保护他们健康的公共机构和官员充满不信任。因此,采取积极措施缓解对抗情绪,并让社区在流行病学研究中发挥积极且建设性的作用至关重要。本文介绍了这样一起事件的案例,并强调了一些经验教训。首要步骤是让社区参与并向其通报情况。成立了一个公民与行业咨询委员会,参与相关工作、出版时事通讯,并定期召开社区会议。时事通讯和社区会议用于发现问题并加以解释;描述科学、政治或财务方面的不确定性;让社区领袖参与其中,包括那些持不信任态度的领袖;开展流行病学普查和社区环境暴露调查。最终结果是缓和了对当局的对抗情绪,社区完全认可报告的价值,报告质量比原本可能达到的更高,并且能够自由地着手解决处理场的问题。