Levine R, Chitwood D D
Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Oct;62:415-22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8562415.
Despite marked national concern, the number of published public health investigations of organic chemical hazardous wastes is small. Moreover, the extant literature provides little or no convincing evidence, either positive or negative, as to the question whether waste sites are harmful to human health. In this review, available literature is characterized as to time, place, and person. The majority of studies began 2 years or more after the end of exposure and 10 years after the start of exposure. Vast geographic areas of exposure have never been investigated. The number of study subjects evaluated has generally been too small to detect rare but important effects. The most common determinant of sites chosen for investigation has been the concern of local citizen groups. Several hypotheses are advanced to explain this pattern: methodologic and logistic difficulties; extensive litigation surrounding many waste sites; governmental reorganization which transferred environmental health from public health authority in the 1970s; and the presence of forces which have worked to block active community diagnosis.
尽管引起了全国的高度关注,但已发表的关于有机化学危险废物的公共卫生调查数量却很少。此外,现有文献几乎没有提供令人信服的证据,无论是正面的还是负面的,来回答废物场地是否对人类健康有害这一问题。在本综述中,对现有文献按时间、地点和人群进行了分类。大多数研究在接触结束后2年或更长时间开始,在接触开始后10年进行。从未对大面积的接触区域进行过调查。评估的研究对象数量通常太少,无法检测到罕见但重要的影响。选择进行调查的场地最常见的决定因素是当地公民团体的关注。提出了几种假说来解释这种模式:方法学和后勤方面的困难;围绕许多废物场地的大量诉讼;20世纪70年代将环境卫生从公共卫生当局转移的政府重组;以及存在阻碍积极社区诊断的力量。