Mekhail Nagy, Costandi Shrif, Armanyous Sherif, Templeton Erin, Acevedo-Moreno Lou-Anne G, Prayson Nicholas
Evidence Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Pain Management Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Apr 10;50(4):331-338. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104869.
There are numerous studies appraising the variables that may influence the clinical outcomes after lumbar thermal radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Expanding the lesion size may increase the likelihood of capturing the target nerves in the lesion, thereby increasing the technical success rate of RFA. However, our literature search has failed to identify a consensus on the optimal target temperature. A retrospective study demonstrated that there seems to be significant functional improvement associated with the temperature of 90°C compared with 80°C. The authors prospectively studied the subject in a double-blinded randomized fashion.
Patients undergoing RFA for lumbar facetogenic pain were randomized in two cohorts (80°C and 90°C). Physicians and patients were blinded to the temperature used. The primary outcome was self-reported pain scores up to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included: self-reported functional improvement, duration of relief as measured by the time before repeat ablation of the same medial branches nerves, opioids' consumption, and patient satisfaction.
Both groups reported pain improvement in all follow-up time points. Overall, both groups achieved statistically significant pain reduction (p<0.05). The median time to repeat RFA in the 80°C group was 112 (49-252) days, while it was 217 (198-348) days in the 90°C group (p<0.04). The univariate analysis emphasized that the RFA temperature is a statistically significant factor for pain improvement of more than 50%, OR 2.7 (1.1 to 6.6) p value=0.031.
RFA has been demonstrated as an effective therapeutic modality for lumbar facetogenic back pain. Yet, the several factors involved in determining a favorable outcome of this procedure require further research and optimization. This prospective double-blinded randomized trial demonstrated that RFA at both temperatures (80°C, 90°C) provided significance at all the time periods examined. However, RFA at 90°C was superior to 80°C in regard to the duration of relief.
有大量研究评估了可能影响腰椎热射频消融术(RFA)临床结果的变量。扩大病变大小可能会增加在病变中捕获目标神经的可能性,从而提高RFA的技术成功率。然而,我们的文献检索未能就最佳目标温度达成共识。一项回顾性研究表明,与80°C相比,90°C的温度似乎与显著的功能改善相关。作者以双盲随机方式对该主题进行了前瞻性研究。
因腰椎小关节源性疼痛接受RFA治疗的患者被随机分为两组(80°C和90°C)。医生和患者对所使用的温度不知情。主要结局是长达12个月的自我报告疼痛评分。次要结局包括:自我报告的功能改善、通过同一内侧支神经再次消融前的时间测量的缓解持续时间、阿片类药物的消耗量以及患者满意度。
两组在所有随访时间点均报告疼痛有所改善。总体而言,两组均实现了具有统计学意义的疼痛减轻(p<0.05)。80°C组再次进行RFA的中位时间为112(49 - 252)天,而90°C组为217(198 - 348)天(p<0.04)。单因素分析强调,RFA温度是疼痛改善超过50%的统计学显著因素,OR为2.7(1.1至6.6),p值 = 0.031。
RFA已被证明是治疗腰椎小关节源性背痛的有效治疗方式。然而,决定该手术良好结局的几个因素需要进一步研究和优化。这项前瞻性双盲随机试验表明,两种温度(80°C、90°C)下的RFA在所有检查时间段均具有显著性。然而,在缓解持续时间方面,90°C的RFA优于80°C。