Ruco Arlinda, Morassaei Sara, Di Prospero Lisa
Author Affiliations : Interdisciplinary Health Program, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada (Dr Ruco); Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Ruco); Practice-Based Research and Innovation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Mss Morassaei and Di Prospero); School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (Ms Morassaei); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Ms Di Prospero).
Qual Manag Health Care. 2024;33(4):261-268. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000443. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
Of the 4 pillars of academic practice for nursing and allied health, research has been the least developed and no standard competency framework exists that is embedded in health professional scopes of practice. The objective of this article is to report on the preliminary development and pilot-testing of research and academic scholarship core competencies for nonphysician health professionals working within a large urban academic health sciences center.
We conducted an internal and external environmental scan and multiphase consultation process to develop research and academic core competencies for health professionals working within an interprofessional setting.
The final framework outlines 3 levels of research proficiency (novice, proficient, and advanced) and the relevant roles, specific competencies, and observable actions and/or activities for each proficiency level.
Organizations should consider the integration of the framework within performance management processes and the development of a road map and self-assessment survey to track progress over time and support health professionals with their academic practice goals.
在护理及相关健康领域的学术实践的四大支柱中,研究是发展最不完善的,且不存在嵌入健康专业人员执业范围的标准能力框架。本文的目的是报告在一个大型城市学术健康科学中心工作的非医师健康专业人员的研究与学术奖学金核心能力的初步开发和试点测试情况。
我们进行了内部和外部环境扫描以及多阶段咨询过程,以制定在跨专业环境中工作的健康专业人员的研究和学术核心能力。
最终框架概述了3个研究熟练程度级别(新手、熟练和高级)以及每个熟练程度级别的相关角色、具体能力和可观察到的行动和/或活动。
组织应考虑将该框架纳入绩效管理流程,并制定路线图和自我评估调查,以跟踪随着时间推移的进展情况,并支持健康专业人员实现其学术实践目标。