• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用数字健康干预措施“INTERCEPT”改善冠心病(CHD)患者的二级预防:一项混合方法非随机可行性研究方案

Using a digital health intervention "INTERCEPT" to improve secondary prevention in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients: protocol for a mixed methods non-randomised feasibility study.

作者信息

Gibson Irene, Jennings Catriona, Neubeck Lis, Corcoran Marissa, Wood David, Sharif Faisal, Hynes Lisa, Murphy Andrew W, Byrne Molly, McEvoy John William

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2025 Jan 31;6:43. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13781.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13781.1
PMID:38414839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10897504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly used for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of "INTERCEPT", a co-designed DHI developed to improve secondary prevention in hospitalised coronary heart disease patients (CHD).

METHODS

This non-randomised, pilot feasibility study with embedded process evaluation will be conducted with a sample of 40 patients in an acute hospital setting. Informed by behaviour change theory, INTERCEPT integrates a smartphone interface, health care professional portal, a fitness wearable and a blood pressure monitor. INTERCEPT is designed to support and motivate patients to set goals, self-monitor lifestyle and medical risk factors, and manage their medications, with the health care professional portal enabling monitoring and communication with patients. Using consecutive sampling, eligible patients will be recruited in two phases, a pre-implementation phase and an implementation phase. Commencing with pre-implementation (1 month duration), participants will not immediately receive INTERCEPT, however, they will be invited to receive INTERCEPT at 3 months follow-up. This will enable early learning about the processes of recruitment and conducting the assessment prior to full scale deployment of INTERCEPT in the next step implementation phase. During the implementation phase (2 months duration), participants will be invited to download INTERCEPT to their smartphone prior to hospital discharge. Qualitative interviews will be conducted among a subset of patients and health care professionals to gain a greater insight into their experience of using INTERCEPT. Primary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Using pre-defined feasibility criteria, including recruitment, retention and engagement rates, together with data on intervention acceptability, will determine the appropriateness of progressing to a definitive trial.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide important insights to help inform the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial of "INTERCEPT" among coronary heart disease patients in a critical health care setting.

摘要

背景

数字健康干预措施(DHIs)越来越多地用于心血管疾病(CVD)的二级预防。本研究的目的是确定“INTERCEPT”的可行性,这是一种共同设计的数字健康干预措施,旨在改善住院冠心病患者(CHD)的二级预防。

方法

本项非随机、带有嵌入式过程评估的试点可行性研究将在一家急症医院对40名患者进行抽样。基于行为改变理论,“INTERCEPT”整合了智能手机界面、医疗保健专业人员门户、健身可穿戴设备和血压监测仪。“INTERCEPT”旨在支持并激励患者设定目标、自我监测生活方式和医学风险因素以及管理其药物,医疗保健专业人员门户则能够对患者进行监测并与之沟通。采用连续抽样法,符合条件的患者将分两个阶段招募,即实施前阶段和实施阶段。从实施前阶段(为期1个月)开始,参与者不会立即接受“INTERCEPT”,不过,他们将被邀请在3个月随访时接受“INTERCEPT”。这将有助于在下一步实施阶段全面部署“INTERCEPT”之前尽早了解招募和进行评估的过程。在实施阶段(为期2个月),参与者将在出院前被邀请将“INTERCEPT”下载到其智能手机上。将对一部分患者和医疗保健专业人员进行定性访谈,以更深入地了解他们使用“INTERCEPT”的体验。主要结局将在基线和3个月随访时进行评估。使用预定义的可行性标准,包括招募率、保留率和参与率,以及关于干预可接受性的数据,将确定是否适合开展确定性试验。

讨论

本研究将提供重要见解,以帮助了解在关键医疗保健环境中对冠心病患者进行“INTERCEPT”确定性试验的可行性。

相似文献

1
Using a digital health intervention "INTERCEPT" to improve secondary prevention in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients: protocol for a mixed methods non-randomised feasibility study.使用数字健康干预措施“INTERCEPT”改善冠心病(CHD)患者的二级预防:一项混合方法非随机可行性研究方案
HRB Open Res. 2025 Jan 31;6:43. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13781.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
3
Emergency Medical Services Streaming Enabled Evaluation In Trauma: The SEE-IT Feasibility RCT.创伤中启用紧急医疗服务流的评估:SEE-IT可行性随机对照试验
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 28:1-38. doi: 10.3310/EUFS2314.
4
Does interdisciplinary group care for the treatment of endometriosis improve pain interference: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial at an urban academic medical centre.跨学科小组护理对子宫内膜异位症治疗的疼痛干扰改善情况:城市学术医疗中心一项试点随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e097372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097372.
5
Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol.药剂师主导的术后出院时阿片类药物降阶梯治疗(DESCALE)——一项多中心、非随机可行性研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;4:48. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13716.2. eCollection 2024.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events.他汀类药物预防冠状动脉事件的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(14):1-160, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11140.
9
Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical activity interventions for the cardiac population: A generic logic model based on intervention mapping.针对心脏疾病人群的体育活动干预:基于干预映射的通用逻辑模型
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0322807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322807. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of a Digital Health Intervention for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (INTERCEPT): Co-Design and Usability Testing Study.开发一种用于心血管疾病二级预防的数字健康干预措施(INTERCEPT):共同设计和可用性测试研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 23;11:e63707. doi: 10.2196/63707.
3
Factors influencing implementation of digital cardiac rehabilitation: A qualitative analysis of health workers perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Behaviour change techniques and intervention characteristics in digital cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.数字心脏康复中行为改变技术和干预特征的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;18(1):189-228. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2185653. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
A New Era in Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery: Research Gaps, Questions, Strategies, and Priorities.心脏康复治疗的新纪元:研究空白、问题、策略和优先事项。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 17;147(3):254-266. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061046.
3
An Overview of Telehealth in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
影响数字心脏康复实施的因素:对卫生工作者观点的定性分析
HRB Open Res. 2024 Jul 26;7:50. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13929.1. eCollection 2024.
远程医疗在心血管疾病管理中的应用概述:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 20;146(25):e558-e568. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001107. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials.运用混合方法进行初步可行性研究以指导干预试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 26;8(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01178-x.
5
World Heart Federation Roadmap for Digital Health in Cardiology.世界心脏联合会心脏病学数字健康路线图。
Glob Heart. 2022 Aug 26;17(1):61. doi: 10.5334/gh.1141. eCollection 2022.
6
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
7
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
8
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
9
The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes.心脏康复在改善心血管结局中的作用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Mar;19(3):180-194. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00611-7. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.