• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同大小的小型良性和恶性实性孤立性肺结节之间的计算机断层扫描鉴别特征。

The differential computed tomography features between small benign and malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules with different sizes.

作者信息

He Xiao-Qun, Huang Xing-Tao, Luo Tian-You, Liu Xiao, Li Qi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Radiology, the Fifth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1348-1358. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-995. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

DOI:10.21037/qims-23-995
PMID:38415140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) has been widely known to be the first choice for the diagnosis of solid solitary pulmonary nodules (SSPNs). However, the smaller the SSPN is, the less the differential CT signs between benign and malignant SSPNs there are, which brings great challenges to their diagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differential CT features between small (≤15 mm) benign and malignant SSPNs with different sizes.

METHODS

From May 2018 to November 2021, CT data of 794 patients with small SSPNs (≤15 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. SSPNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and each group was further classified into three cohorts: cohort I (diameter ≤6 mm), cohort II (6 mm < diameter ≤8 mm), and cohort III (8 mm < diameter ≤15 mm). The differential CT features of benign and malignant SSPNs in three cohorts were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors of benign SSPNs.

RESULTS

In cohort I, polygonal shape and upper-lobe distribution differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05) and multiparametric analysis showed polygonal shape [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 12.165; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.512-97.872; P=0.019] was the most effective variation for predicting benign SSPNs, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.640-0.855; P=0.001). In cohort II, polygonal shape, lobulation, pleural retraction, and air bronchogram differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05), and polygonal shape (OR: 8.870; 95% CI: 1.096-71.772; P=0.041) and the absence of pleural retraction (OR: 0.306; 95% CI: 0.106-0.883; P=0.028) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.694-0.863; P<0.001). In cohort III, 12 CT features showed significant differences between groups (all P<0.05) and polygonal shape (OR: 3.953; 95% CI: 1.508-10.361; P=0.005); calcification (OR: 3.710; 95% CI: 1.305-10.551; P=0.014); halo sign (OR: 6.237; 95% CI: 2.838-13.710; P<0.001); satellite lesions (OR: 6.554; 95% CI: 3.225-13.318; P<0.001); and the absence of lobulation (OR: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.026-0.167; P<0.001), air space (OR: 0.405; 95% CI: 0.215-0.764; P=0.005), pleural retraction (OR: 0.297; 95% CI: 0.179-0.493; P<0.001), bronchial truncation (OR: 0.165; 95% CI: 0.090-0.303; P<0.001), and air bronchogram (OR: 0.363; 95% CI: 0.208-0.633; P<0.001) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.840-0.897; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CT features vary between SSPNs with different sizes. Clarifying the differential CT features based on different diameter ranges may help to minimize ambiguities and discriminate the benign SSPNs from malignant ones.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/e58faa74f0c7/qims-14-02-1348-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/9ec1a5e9a562/qims-14-02-1348-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/8e82b9844c45/qims-14-02-1348-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/9d2b924fac92/qims-14-02-1348-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/14fe062365d7/qims-14-02-1348-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/e58faa74f0c7/qims-14-02-1348-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/9ec1a5e9a562/qims-14-02-1348-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/8e82b9844c45/qims-14-02-1348-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/9d2b924fac92/qims-14-02-1348-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/14fe062365d7/qims-14-02-1348-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f702/10895103/e58faa74f0c7/qims-14-02-1348-f5.jpg
摘要

背景

计算机断层扫描(CT)一直是诊断实性孤立性肺结节(SSPNs)的首选方法。然而,SSPNs越小,其良恶性之间的CT鉴别征象就越少,这给它们的诊断带来了巨大挑战。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同大小的小(≤15mm)良性和恶性SSPNs之间的CT鉴别特征。

方法

回顾性分析2018年5月至2021年11月794例小SSPNs(≤15mm)患者的CT数据。将SSPNs分为良性和恶性组,每组再进一步分为三个队列:队列I(直径≤6mm)、队列II(6mm<直径≤8mm)和队列III(8mm<直径≤15mm)。确定三个队列中良性和恶性SSPNs的CT鉴别特征。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定良性SSPNs的独立因素。

结果

在队列I中,组间多边形形态和上叶分布差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),多参数分析显示多边形形态[调整优势比(OR):12.165;95%置信区间(CI):1.512 - 97.872;P = 0.019]是预测良性SSPNs最有效的变量,受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.747(95%CI:0.640 - 0.855;P = 0.001)。在队列II中,组间多边形形态、分叶、胸膜凹陷和气支气管征差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),多边形形态(OR:8.870;95%CI:1.096 - 71.772;P = 0.041)和无胸膜凹陷(OR:0.306;95%CI:0.106 - 0.883;P = 0.028)是良性SSPNs的独立预测因素,AUC为0.778(95%CI:0.694 - 0.863;P<0.001)。在队列III中,12个CT特征在组间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),多边形形态(OR:3.953;95%CI:1.508 - 10.361;P = 0.005);钙化(OR:3.710;95%CI:1.305 - 10.551;P = 0.014);晕征(OR:6.237;95%CI:2.838 - 13.710;P<0.001);卫星灶(OR:6.554;95%CI:3.225 - 13.318;P<0.001);无分叶(OR:0.066;95%CI:0.026 - 0.167;P<0.001)、空气潴留(OR:0.405;95%CI:0.215 - 0.764;P = 0.005)、胸膜凹陷(OR:0.297;95%CI:0.179 - 0.493;P<0.001)、支气管截断(OR:0.165;95%CI:0.090 - 0.303;P<0.001)和气支气管征(OR:0.363;95%CI:0.208 - 0.633;P<0.001)是良性SSPNs的独立预测因素,AUC为0.869(95%CI:0.840 - 0.897;P<0.001)。

结论

不同大小的SSPNs的CT特征有所不同。明确基于不同直径范围的CT鉴别特征可能有助于减少模糊性,并将良性SSPNs与恶性SSPNs区分开来。

相似文献

1
The differential computed tomography features between small benign and malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules with different sizes.不同大小的小型良性和恶性实性孤立性肺结节之间的计算机断层扫描鉴别特征。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1348-1358. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-995. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
A prediction model based on computed tomography characteristics for identifying malignant from benign sub-centimeter solid pulmonary nodules.基于计算机断层扫描特征的亚厘米实性肺结节良恶性鉴别预测模型。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4238-4249. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1943. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Development of a combined radiomics and CT feature-based model for differentiating malignant from benign subcentimeter solid pulmonary nodules.开发一种联合放射组学和 CT 特征的模型,用于区分亚厘米实性肺结节的良恶性。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Jan 17;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00400-6.
4
A Self-supervised Learning-Based Fine-Grained Classification Model for Distinguishing Malignant From Benign Subcentimeter Solid Pulmonary Nodules.一种基于自监督学习的细粒度分类模型,用于区分亚厘米实性肺结节的良恶性。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Nov;31(11):4687-4695. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Computed-tomography-based radiomic nomogram for predicting the risk of indeterminate small (5-20 mm) solid pulmonary nodules.基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学列线图预测不确定的小(5-20mm)实性肺结节的风险。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023 Mar 29;29(2):283-290. doi: 10.4274/dir.2022.22395. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
6
Diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based method in differentiating malignant from benign subcentimeter (≤10 mm) solid pulmonary nodules.一种基于深度学习的方法在鉴别直径小于1厘米(≤10毫米)的实性肺结节良恶性方面的诊断性能。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):5475-5484. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-985. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Small solitary pulmonary nodules (< or =1 cm) detected at population-based CT screening for lung cancer: Reliable high-resolution CT features of benign lesions.在基于人群的肺癌CT筛查中检测到的小的孤立性肺结节(≤1 cm):良性病变可靠的高分辨率CT特征。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Apr;180(4):955-64. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800955.
8
CT-Assisted Improvements in the Accuracy of the Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Ground-Glass Density Nodules.CT 辅助提高磨玻璃密度结节术中冰冻切片检查的准确性。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jan 7;2022:8967643. doi: 10.1155/2022/8967643. eCollection 2022.
9
Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas.孤立性实性肺结节:基于CT的深度学习列线图有助于鉴别结核性肉芽肿与肺腺癌。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6497-6507. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07024-z. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
10
Primary solid lung cancerous nodules with different sizes: computed tomography features and their variations.不同大小的原发性肺部实性结节:CT 特征及其变化。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6274-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of CT radiomics diagnostic models: differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules and evaluating malignancy degree.CT影像组学诊断模型的开发与验证:鉴别肺结节的良恶性及评估恶性程度
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):1645-1672. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-152. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Risk factors for malignant solid pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.恶性实性肺结节的危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13702-2.
3
The diagnostic value of vascular architecture in solid solitary pulmonary nodules quantified by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review.评估肺部结节患者:综述。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):264-273. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24287.
2
Two-stage multitask U-Net construction for pulmonary nodule segmentation and malignancy risk prediction.用于肺结节分割和恶性风险预测的两阶段多任务U-Net构建
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):292-309. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-19.
3
Features for Predicting Absorbable Pulmonary Solid Nodules as Depicted on Thin-Section Computed Tomography.薄层计算机断层扫描显示的可吸收性肺实性结节的预测特征
动态对比增强磁共振成像定量评估实性孤立性肺结节中血管结构的诊断价值
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):19-30. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1467. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
Development of a clinical prediction model for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules with a CTR ≥ 50% utilizing artificial intelligence-driven radiomics analysis.利用人工智能驱动的放射组学分析开发一种针对实性成分比例(CTR)≥50%的良性和恶性肺结节的临床预测模型。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01533-9.
5
Application value of CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology in the identification of benign and malignant lung nodules and the characteristics of nodule distribution.CT三维重建技术在肺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值及结节分布特征
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01505-z.
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Jul 2;14:2933-2939. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S318125. eCollection 2021.
4
The application of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography in solitary pulmonary nodule identification.双层光谱探测器计算机断层扫描在孤立性肺结节识别中的应用。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Feb;11(2):521-532. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-2.
5
Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Challenges and a Look Ahead, From the Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems.肺- RADS 版本 1.1:挑战与展望,来自放射学报告和数据系统特刊。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jun;216(6):1411-1422. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24807. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Implications of the updated Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS version 1.1) for lung cancer screening.更新后的肺部CT筛查报告与数据系统(Lung-RADS 1.1版)对肺癌筛查的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6966-6977. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-cptn-02.
7
Predicting Lung Cancer Risk of Incidental Solid and Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules in Different Sizes.预测不同大小的偶然实性和亚实性肺结节的肺癌风险
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 4;12:8057-8066. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S256719. eCollection 2020.
8
Primary solid lung cancerous nodules with different sizes: computed tomography features and their variations.不同大小的原发性肺部实性结节:CT 特征及其变化。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6274-0.
9
Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios.更新版 Fleischner 学会肺部结节管理指南:常见问题和挑战性情况。
Radiographics. 2018 Sep-Oct;38(5):1337-1350. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017.
10
The value of the air bronchogram sign on CT image in the identification of different solitary pulmonary consolidation lesions.CT图像上空气支气管征在鉴别不同类型孤立性肺实变病变中的价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11985. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011985.