• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独生子女家庭与多子女家庭儿童青少年心理健康状况的比较:meta 分析。

Mental health status among children and adolescents in one-child and multichild families: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

机构信息

Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, & Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.

Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;37(3):147-161. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000935. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000935
PMID:38415684
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Controversy remains about the difference in mental health status among children and adolescents between one-child and multichild families in China. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing mental health status between both groups and explored their potential moderating factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Totally, 113 eligible studies encompassing 237 899 participants (one-child families: 83 125; multichild families: 154 774) were included. The pooled SMD of SCL-90 total score was -0.115 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -0.152; -0.078; I2  = 86.9%]. Specifically, children and adolescents from one-child families exhibited lower scores in terms of somatization (SMD = -0.056; 95% CI: -0.087; -0.026), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (SMD = -0.116; 95% CI: -0.154; -0.079), interpersonal sensitivity (SMD = -0.140; 95% CI: -0.171; -0.109), depression (SMD = -0.123; 95% CI: -0.159; -0.088); anxiety (SMD = -0.121; 95% CI: -0.151; -0.092); phobic anxiety (SMD = -0.124; 95% CI: -0.166; -0.081); paranoid ideation (SMD = -0.040; 95% CI: -0.070; -0.009); and psychoticism (SMD = -0.119; 95% CI: -0.148; -0.089). Study publication year was significantly associated with differences in mental health status between both groups ( P  = 0.015).

SUMMARY

Children and adolescents from one-child families had better mental health status compared to those from multichild families in China. Future studies should investigate the underlying factors contributing to such mental health differences, and the potential interventions that could address these mental health problems.

摘要

目的综述

中国一孩家庭和二孩家庭的儿童和青少年在心理健康状况方面存在差异,这一问题仍存在争议。因此,我们对比较两组心理健康状况的研究进行了荟萃分析,并探讨了其潜在的调节因素。

最近的发现

共纳入 113 项符合条件的研究,包含 237899 名参与者(一孩家庭:83125 名;二孩家庭:154774 名)。SCL-90 总分的合并 SMD 为-0.115[95%置信区间(95%CI):-0.152;-0.078;I²=86.9%]。具体而言,一孩家庭的儿童和青少年在躯体化(SMD=-0.056;95%CI:-0.087;-0.026)、强迫症症状(SMD=-0.116;95%CI:-0.154;-0.079)、人际敏感(SMD=-0.140;95%CI:-0.171;-0.109)、抑郁(SMD=-0.123;95%CI:-0.159;-0.088)、焦虑(SMD=-0.121;95%CI:-0.151;-0.092)、恐怖症(SMD=-0.124;95%CI:-0.166;-0.081)、偏执观念(SMD=-0.040;95%CI:-0.070;-0.009)和精神病性(SMD=-0.119;95%CI:-0.148;-0.089)方面的得分较低。研究发表年份与两组间心理健康状况的差异显著相关(P=0.015)。

总结

与二孩家庭的儿童和青少年相比,一孩家庭的儿童和青少年心理健康状况更好。未来的研究应调查导致这种心理健康差异的潜在因素,以及可能解决这些心理健康问题的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Mental health status among children and adolescents in one-child and multichild families: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.独生子女家庭与多子女家庭儿童青少年心理健康状况的比较:meta 分析。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;37(3):147-161. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000935. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
3
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
4
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
5
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性复发性疼痛的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub4.
6
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.针对受人道主义危机影响的低收入和中等收入国家精神障碍治疗的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 5;7(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2.
7
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性复发性疼痛的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 29;9(9):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub5.
8
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness.针对患有慢性病的儿童和青少年家长的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3(3):CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub4.
10
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health status of secondary school students: a meta-analysis of comparative studies between one-child and multi-child families in China.中国中学生心理健康状况:独生子女人数与多子女家庭比较研究的荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 7;16:1594968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1594968. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors Influencing the Mental Health of First-Year College Students: Evidence from Digital Records of Daily Behaviors.影响大学新生心理健康的因素:来自日常行为数字记录的证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 2;15(5):618. doi: 10.3390/bs15050618.
3
A latent profile analysis of empathizing-systemizing cognitive style among Chinese children aged 6 - 12 years: Links to intelligence, executive function, and autistic traits.
6至12岁中国儿童共情-系统化认知风格的潜在剖面分析:与智力、执行功能及自闭症特征的关联
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100554. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100554. Epub 2025 Feb 15.