Jeffrey Nicole K, Senn Charlene Y
Department of Psychology, University of Windsor.
Women's and Gender Studies Program, University of Windsor.
J Sex Res. 2025 Feb;62(2):208-223. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2322591. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
The current mixed-method study examined gender differences in sexual violence (SV) perpetration behaviors and the validity of perpetration reports made on the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration (SES-SFP). Fifty-four university students (31 women and 23 men) were asked to think out loud while privately completing an online version of the SES-SFP and to describe (typed response) behaviors that they reported having engaged in on the SES. Those who reported no such behavior were asked to describe any similar behaviors they may have engaged in. Integration of the quantitative responses on the SES and the qualitative descriptions of the events reported showed that men's SV perpetration was more frequent and severe than women's. The qualitative event descriptions further suggested that men's verbal coercion was often harsher in tone and that men more often than women used physical force (including in events only reported as verbal coercion on the SES). Unlike men, women often reported that their response to a refusal was not intended to pressure their partner or obtain the sexual activity. Two women also mistakenly reported experiences of their own victimization or compliance (giving in to unwanted sex) on SES perpetration items, which inflated women's SV perpetration rate. Findings suggest that quantitative measurement can miss important qualitative differences in women and men's behaviors and may underestimate men's and overestimate women's SV perpetration. Participants also sometimes misinterpreted or described confusion around the SES items, suggesting a need for updated language on this and other quantitative measures.
当前的混合方法研究考察了性暴力(SV)实施行为中的性别差异,以及在《性经历调查简表实施情况》(SES-SFP)中所做的实施行为报告的有效性。54名大学生(31名女性和23名男性)被要求在私下完成SES-SFP在线版本时边思考边出声说出来,并描述(打字回复)他们在SES中报告的行为。那些报告没有此类行为的人被要求描述他们可能参与过的任何类似行为。对SES上的定量回答与所报告事件的定性描述进行整合后发现,男性的性暴力实施行为比女性更频繁、更严重。定性事件描述进一步表明,男性的言语胁迫在语气上往往更严厉,而且男性比女性更常使用身体暴力(包括在SES上仅报告为言语胁迫的事件中)。与男性不同,女性经常报告说,她们对拒绝的回应并非意在向伴侣施压或进行性行为。两名女性还在SES实施项目上错误地报告了自己遭受侵害或顺从(屈服于不情愿的性行为)的经历,这夸大了女性的性暴力实施率。研究结果表明,定量测量可能会忽略男女行为中重要的定性差异,可能会低估男性的性暴力实施行为,高估女性的性暴力实施行为。参与者有时也会误解或描述对SES项目的困惑,这表明需要更新该量表及其他定量测量工具的表述。