Suppr超能文献

加拿大学术外科协会的种族和性别多样性。

Race and sex diversity in Canadian academic surgical societies.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2024 Apr;48(4):807-815. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12114. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is vital for national professional surgical societies to embrace diversity, inclusion, and equity. This study examines race and sex diversity in two Canadian surgical societies.

METHODS

Websites of the Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons (CSCS) and the Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS) and previous programs of their annual meetings were reviewed. Leadership positions, conference speakers, and award winners were categorized by race and sex.

RESULTS

White males made up the largest category of Cardiac Surgery meeting speakers (73/142 [51%]), CAGS committee members (89/198 [45%]), CAGS past presidents (38/43 [88%]), and General Surgery meeting speakers (841/1472 [57%]). Of the 17 members that made up the CSCS board of directors and officers, 8 were White males (47%), 5 were BIPOC males (29%), 3 were White females (18%), and 1 was a BIPOC female (6%). Of the 42 members of the CAGS board of directors and advisory committee, 16 were White males (38%), 5 were BIPOC males (12%), 17 were White females (40%), and 4 were BIPOC females (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

BIPOC individuals and females are underrepresented in both societies compared to White males. However, in CAGS, improvements in representation can be seen in recent years. It is important that both of these organizations continue to embrace diversity.

摘要

背景

国家专业外科协会接纳多样性、包容性和公平性至关重要。本研究检查了两个加拿大外科协会中的种族和性别多样性。

方法

审查了加拿大心脏外科医师学会(CSCS)和加拿大普通外科医师协会(CAGS)的网站以及其年会的以往计划。根据种族和性别对领导职位、会议演讲者和获奖者进行了分类。

结果

白人男性在心脏外科学术会议演讲者中占比最大(73/142[51%])、CAGS 委员会成员(89/198[45%])、CAGS 前主席(38/43[88%])和普通外科学术会议演讲者(841/1472[57%])。在 CSCS 董事会和官员的 17 名成员中,有 8 名是白人男性(47%)、5 名是 BIPOC 男性(29%)、3 名是白人女性(18%)和 1 名是 BIPOC 女性(6%)。在 CAGS 董事会和顾问委员会的 42 名成员中,有 16 名是白人男性(38%)、5 名是 BIPOC 男性(12%)、17 名是白人女性(40%)和 4 名是 BIPOC 女性(10%)。

结论

与白人男性相比,BIPOC 个人和女性在这两个协会中的代表性都不足。然而,在 CAGS 中,近年来代表情况有所改善。这两个组织都继续接纳多样性非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验