• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化公共卫生接触者追踪干预对教育环境中 SARS-CoV-2 二次传播的影响:四向分解分析。

Effect of an enhanced public health contact tracing intervention on the secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings: The four-way decomposition analysis.

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Centre for Environmental, Nutritional and Genetic Epidemiology (CREAGEN), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Elife. 2024 Feb 28;13:e85802. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85802.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.85802
PMID:38416129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10901504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that the community contact tracing strategy of testing contacts in households immediately instead of at the end of quarantine had an impact on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools in Reggio Emilia Province.

METHODS

We analysed surveillance data on notification of COVID-19 cases in schools between 1 September 2020 and 4 April 2021. We have applied a mediation analysis that allows for interaction between the intervention (before/after period) and the mediator.

RESULTS

Median tracing delay decreased from 7 to 3.1 days and the percentage of the known infection source increased from 34-54.8% (incident rate ratio-IRR 1.61 1.40-1.86). Implementation of prompt contact tracing was associated with a 10% decrease in the number of secondary cases (excess relative risk -0.1 95% CI -0.35-0.15). Knowing the source of infection of the index case led to a decrease in secondary transmission (IRR 0.75 95% CI 0.63-0.91) while the decrease in tracing delay was associated with decreased risk of secondary cases (1/IRR 0.97 95% CI 0.94-1.01 per one day of delay). The direct effect of the intervention accounted for the 29% decrease in the number of secondary cases (excess relative risk -0.29 95%-0.61 to 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Prompt contact testing in the community reduces the time of contact tracing and increases the ability to identify the source of infection in school outbreaks. Although there are strong reasons for thinking it is a causal link, observed differences can be also due to differences in the force of infection and to other control measures put in place.

FUNDING

This project was carried out with the technical and financial support of the Italian Ministry of Health - CCM 2020 and Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2023.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在检验以下假设,即在雷焦艾米利亚省(意大利北部城市),社区接触者追踪策略是对家庭中的接触者进行立即检测而不是在隔离结束时进行检测,这对学校中 SARS-CoV-2 的传播有影响。

方法

我们分析了 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 4 日期间学校内 COVID-19 病例的监测数据。我们应用了一种中介分析,该分析允许干预(前后时期)和中介之间进行交互。

结果

中位追踪延迟从 7 天缩短至 3.1 天,已知感染源的比例从 34-54.8%(发病率比-IRR 1.61 1.40-1.86)。实施及时的接触者追踪与二次病例数减少 10%相关(超额相对风险-0.1 95%CI-0.35-0.15)。了解索引病例的感染源可降低二次传播的风险(IRR 0.75 95%CI 0.63-0.91),而追踪延迟的减少与二次病例风险的降低相关(每延迟一天 1/IRR 0.97 95%CI 0.94-1.01)。干预的直接效应占二次病例数减少的 29%(超额相对风险-0.29 95%-0.61 至 0.03)。

结论

在社区中及时进行接触者检测可缩短接触追踪的时间,并提高在学校疫情中识别感染源的能力。尽管有充分的理由认为这是一种因果关系,但观察到的差异也可能归因于感染强度的差异以及实施的其他控制措施。

资金

本项目在意大利卫生部-CCM 2020 和 2023 年年度研究计划的技术和资金支持下进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/23929be0ad89/elife-85802-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/c35820757fc1/elife-85802-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/0433dcd62a77/elife-85802-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/c60bec84daba/elife-85802-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/9a7660a4cf60/elife-85802-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/23929be0ad89/elife-85802-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/c35820757fc1/elife-85802-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/0433dcd62a77/elife-85802-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/c60bec84daba/elife-85802-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/9a7660a4cf60/elife-85802-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6f/10901504/23929be0ad89/elife-85802-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of an enhanced public health contact tracing intervention on the secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings: The four-way decomposition analysis.强化公共卫生接触者追踪干预对教育环境中 SARS-CoV-2 二次传播的影响:四向分解分析。
Elife. 2024 Feb 28;13:e85802. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85802.
2
Surveillance, contact tracing and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings in Northern Italy, September 2020 to April 2021.2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月意大利北部教育机构中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的监测、接触者追踪和特征。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275667. eCollection 2022.
3
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational institutions, August to December 2020, Germany.2020 年 8 月至 12 月德国教育机构中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的监测。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Sep 22;149:e213. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821002077.
4
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: a retrospective cohort study.SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率和高危密切接触者的传播风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):333-343. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30833-1. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
5
Evaluating the impact on health outcomes of an event that resulted in a delay in contact tracing of COVID-19 cases in England, September 2020: an observational study.评估 2020 年 9 月在英格兰,因新冠病毒病例接触者追踪延迟而导致的事件对健康结果的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e064982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064982.
6
Personal protective measures and settings on the risk of SARS-COV-2 community transmission: a case-control study.个人防护措施和社区传播 SARS-COV-2 风险环境:一项病例对照研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1327082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1327082. eCollection 2023.
7
Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in close contacts of adults at high risk of infection due to occupation: results from the contact tracing strategy of the CoVIDA epidemiological surveillance study in Bogotá, Colombia, in 2020-2021.成人职业感染高风险密切接触者中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的风险因素:2020-2021 年哥伦比亚波哥大 CoVIDA 流行病学监测研究中的接触者追踪策略的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 23;12(12):e062487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062487.
8
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children and young people in households and schools: A meta-analysis of population-based and contact-tracing studies.家庭和学校中儿童和青少年传播 SARS-CoV-2:基于人群和接触者追踪研究的荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2022 Mar;84(3):361-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.026. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
9
Effectiveness of contact tracing and quarantine on reducing COVID-19 transmission: a retrospective cohort study.接触者追踪和隔离在减少 COVID-19 传播方面的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
10
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 transmission patterns in educational settings during the Alpha wave in Reggio-Emilia, Italy.意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅大区阿尔法波期间教育环境中 SARS-CoV-2 的传播模式。
Epidemics. 2023 Sep;44:100712. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100712. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Surveillance, contact tracing and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings in Northern Italy, September 2020 to April 2021.2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月意大利北部教育机构中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的监测、接触者追踪和特征。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275667. eCollection 2022.
3
Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19.
关于 COVID-19 后向接触者追踪效率的实证证据。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 13;13(1):4750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6.
4
Evaluation of a Test to Stay Strategy in Transitional Kindergarten Through Grade 12 Schools - Los Angeles County, California, August 16-October 31, 2021.评估过渡幼儿园至 12 年级学校中的“Test to Stay”策略 - 加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县,2021 年 8 月 16 日至 10 月 31 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 31;70(5152):1773-1777. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm705152e1.
5
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children and young people in households and schools: A meta-analysis of population-based and contact-tracing studies.家庭和学校中儿童和青少年传播 SARS-CoV-2:基于人群和接触者追踪研究的荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2022 Mar;84(3):361-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.026. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
Comprehensive Contact Tracing, Testing and Sequencing Show Limited Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between Children in Schools in Norway, August 2020 to May 2021.2020年8月至2021年5月,挪威对学校儿童间SARS-CoV-2传播情况开展的全面接触者追踪、检测和测序显示传播有限。
Microorganisms. 2021 Dec 14;9(12):2587. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122587.
7
Daily testing for contacts of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection and attendance and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in English secondary schools and colleges: an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.对感染 SARS-CoV-2 的个体的接触者进行日常检测以及英国中学和大学的出勤率和 SARS-CoV-2 传播:一项开放标签、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 2;398(10307):1217-1229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01908-5. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
Contact tracing efficiency, transmission heterogeneity, and accelerating COVID-19 epidemics.接触者追踪效率、传播异质性与加速 COVID-19 疫情。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jun 17;17(6):e1009122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009122. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
A cross-sectional and prospective cohort study of the role of schools in the SARS-CoV-2 second wave in Italy.一项关于意大利学校在新冠病毒第二波疫情中作用的横断面和前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun;5:100092. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100092. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Impact of contact tracing on COVID-19 mortality: An impact evaluation using surveillance data from Colombia.接触者追踪对 COVID-19 死亡率的影响:利用哥伦比亚监测数据进行的影响评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0246987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246987. eCollection 2021.