Suppr超能文献

接触者追踪对 COVID-19 死亡率的影响:利用哥伦比亚监测数据进行的影响评估。

Impact of contact tracing on COVID-19 mortality: An impact evaluation using surveillance data from Colombia.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Research Office, San Ignacio University Hospital, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0246987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246987. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact tracing is a crucial part of the public health surveillance toolkit. However, it is labor-intensive and costly to carry it out. Some countries have faced challenges implementing contact tracing, and no impact evaluations using empirical data have assessed its impact on COVID-19 mortality. This study assesses the impact of contact tracing in a middle-income country, providing data to support the expansion and optimization of contact tracing strategies to improve infection control.

METHODS

We obtained publicly available data on all confirmed COVID-19 cases in Colombia between March 2 and June 16, 2020. (N = 54,931 cases over 135 days of observation). As suggested by WHO guidelines, we proxied contact tracing performance as the proportion of cases identified through contact tracing out of all cases identified. We calculated the daily proportion of cases identified through contact tracing across 37 geographical units (32 departments and five districts). Further, we used a sequential log-log fixed-effects model to estimate the 21-days, 28-days, 42-days, and 56-days lagged impact of the proportion of cases identified through contact tracing on daily COVID-19 mortality. Both the proportion of cases identified through contact tracing and the daily number of COVID-19 deaths are smoothed using 7-day moving averages. Models control for the prevalence of active cases, second-degree polynomials, and mobility indices. Robustness checks to include supply-side variables were performed.

RESULTS

We found that a 10 percent increase in the proportion of cases identified through contact tracing is related to COVID-19 mortality reductions between 0.8% and 3.4%. Our models explain between 47%-70% of the variance in mortality. Results are robust to changes of specification and inclusion of supply-side variables.

CONCLUSION

Contact tracing is instrumental in containing infectious diseases. Its prioritization as a surveillance strategy will substantially impact reducing deaths while minimizing the impact on the fragile economic systems of lower and middle-income countries. This study provides lessons for other LMIC.

摘要

背景

接触者追踪是公共卫生监测工具包的重要组成部分。然而,实施接触者追踪需要大量的人力和财力。一些国家在实施接触者追踪方面面临挑战,并且没有使用经验数据评估其对 COVID-19 死亡率的影响的影响评估。本研究评估了中低收入国家接触者追踪的影响,提供了支持扩大和优化接触者追踪策略以改善感染控制的数据。

方法

我们获得了哥伦比亚 2020 年 3 月 2 日至 6 月 16 日期间所有确诊 COVID-19 病例的公开数据(观察期内共 135 天,共 54931 例病例)。根据世界卫生组织的指导方针,我们将接触者追踪的表现代理为通过接触者追踪发现的病例数占所有发现病例数的比例。我们计算了 37 个地理单位(32 个部门和 5 个区)中通过接触者追踪发现的病例的每日比例。此外,我们使用序贯对数固定效应模型来估计通过接触者追踪发现的病例比例对每日 COVID-19 死亡率的 21 天、28 天、42 天和 56 天滞后影响。通过接触者追踪发现的病例比例和每日 COVID-19 死亡人数均使用 7 天移动平均值进行平滑处理。模型控制了活跃病例的流行率、二次多项式和流动性指数。进行了包括供应方变量的稳健性检查。

结果

我们发现,通过接触者追踪发现的病例比例增加 10%,与 COVID-19 死亡率降低 0.8%至 3.4%相关。我们的模型解释了死亡率变化的 47%-70%。结果在规范变更和包括供应方变量时具有稳健性。

结论

接触者追踪对于控制传染病至关重要。将其作为监测策略进行优先排序将大大降低死亡率,同时将对中下收入国家脆弱的经济系统的影响降至最低。本研究为其他中低收入国家提供了经验教训。

相似文献

1
Impact of contact tracing on COVID-19 mortality: An impact evaluation using surveillance data from Colombia.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0246987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246987. eCollection 2021.
2
Effectiveness of contact tracing to reduce fatality from COVID-19: preliminary evidence from Colombia.
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
COVID-19 Contact Tracing as an Indicator for Evaluating a Pandemic Situation: Simulation Study.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 6;9:e43836. doi: 10.2196/43836.
5
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
8
Investigation and contact tracing of the first cases of COVID-19 in Mozambique, 2020.
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Apr 14;41:302. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.302.26979. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

2
Improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a message co-design process for a national mHealth intervention in Colombia.
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2242670. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2242670.
3
Effectiveness of testing, contact tracing and isolation interventions among the general population on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230131. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0131. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Optimizing the order of actions in a model of contact tracing.
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jan 20;2(3):pgad003. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
COVID-19 in Latin America: A Snapshot in Time and the Road Ahead.
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Feb;12(2):389-410. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00748-z. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
9
Modeling the impact of surveillance activities combined with physical distancing interventions on COVID-19 epidemics at a local level.
Infect Dis Model. 2022 Dec;7(4):811-822. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 29;19(21):14143. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114143.

本文引用的文献

1
Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study.
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e175-e183. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30308-X. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage.
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):61-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32228-5. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0241473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241473. eCollection 2020.
5
Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e607-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Covid-19 in Latin America.
BMJ. 2020 Jul 27;370:m2939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2939.
7
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Cognitive Bias and Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11623.
9
Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19).
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):861-866. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214051. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
A Framework for Sustainable Contact Tracing and Exposure Investigation for Large Health Systems.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jul;95(7):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验