STOPP/START第3版：临床药剂师提出担忧。 - Suppr

STOPP/START version 3: clinical pharmacists are raising concerns.

作者信息

Massé Olivier, Flamand Villeneuve Joëlle, Lahaie Alexandre, Marcoux Claudia, Hill James, Papillon-Ferland Louise, Desforges Katherine

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy and Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur-de-Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Department of Pharmacy, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):589-591. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00961-8. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s41999-024-00961-8

PMID:38416401

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

STOPP/START version 3: clinical pharmacists are raising concerns.STOPP/START第3版：临床药剂师提出担忧。

Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):589-591. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00961-8. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Response to letter by Masse O et al. STOPP/START version 3: clinical pharmacists are raising alarms.对Masse O等人来信的回复。STOPP/START第3版：临床药师敲响警钟。

Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):593-596. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00958-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Related Hospital Admissions in Geriatric Patients: A Comparative Analysis between the STOPP and START Criteria Versions 1 and 2.潜在不适当处方和老年患者相关住院治疗：STOPP 和 START 标准版本 1 和 2 的比较分析。

Drugs Aging. 2019 May;36(5):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-00635-8.

Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version.使用更新版STOPP-START标准评估社区老年患者潜在不适当处方：与原始版本的特征和患病率比较

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167586. eCollection 2016.

STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate medications/potential prescribing omissions in older people: origin and progress.老年人潜在不适当药物/潜在处方遗漏的 STOPP/START 标准：起源和进展。

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;13(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1697676. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

Authors' response to points raised by Boland et al. regarding STOPP/START version 3 criteria.作者对博兰等人就STOPP/START第3版标准提出的观点的回应。

Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Oct;14(5):1151-1154. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00875-x. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

Potentially inappropriate medications and potentially prescribing omissions in Chinese older patients: Comparison of two versions of STOPP/START.潜在不适当药物和潜在处方遗漏在中国老年患者中的比较：两种版本的 STOPP/START。

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Dec;45(6):1405-1413. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13237. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

'Modified STOPP-START criteria for Sri Lanka'; translating to a resource limited healthcare setting by Delphi consensus.斯里兰卡改良的 STOPP-START 标准；通过德尔菲共识转化为资源有限的医疗保健环境。

BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1293-x.

A comparison of the application of STOPP/START to patients' drug lists with and without clinical information.比较 STOPP/START 在有和没有临床信息的患者药物清单中的应用。

Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Apr;35(2):230-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9733-0. Epub 2012 Dec 9.

STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3.老年人潜在不适当处方的 STOPP/START 标准：第 3 版。

Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y. Epub 2023 May 31.

引用本文的文献

Improving usability of the STOPP/START version 3 criteria: development of a practice tool for clinicians, students and researchers.提高STOPP/START第3版标准的可用性：为临床医生、学生和研究人员开发一种实用工具

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01214-y.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Identified Using STOPP/START Version 3 in Geriatric Patients and Comparison with Version 2: A Cross-Sectional Study.使用STOPP/START第3版在老年患者中识别潜在不适当处方并与第2版进行比较：一项横断面研究。

J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6043. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206043.

本文引用的文献

Clinical appraisal of STOPP/START version 3 criteria.STOPP/START第3版标准的临床评估

Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Oct;14(5):1149-1150. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00839-1. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3.老年人潜在不适当处方的 STOPP/START 标准：第 3 版。

Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y. Epub 2023 May 31.

The EURO-FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) List Version 2: Consensus Validation of a Clinical Tool for Improved Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults.EURO-FORTA（适合老年人）清单第 2 版：改善老年人药物治疗的临床工具的共识验证。

Drugs Aging. 2023 May;40(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01024-6. Epub 2023 May 2.

The role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in frail older adults with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在伴有或不伴有 2 型糖尿病的虚弱老年患者中的作用。

Age Ageing. 2022 Oct 6;51(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac201.

The MedSafer Study-Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.《MedSafer 研究-电子决策支持在老年住院患者中减药的应用：一项集群随机临床试验》。

JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):265-273. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7429.

Association Between Use of Pharmacokinetic-Interacting Drugs and Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Nested Case-Control Study.使用药物代谢动力学相互作用药物与直接口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性之间的关系：巢式病例对照研究。

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;110(6):1526-1536. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2369. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

Selection of antiepileptic drugs in older people.老年人抗癫痫药物的选择。

Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014 Jun;16(6):295. doi: 10.1007/s11940-014-0295-4.

Renal safety in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a review.双膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症患者的肾脏安全性：综述。

J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Oct;28(10):2049-59. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2058.

Seizure risk associated with neuroactive drugs: data from the WHO adverse drug reactions database.与神经活性药物相关的癫痫发作风险：来自世卫组织药物不良反应数据库的数据。

Seizure. 2010 Mar;19(2):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STOPP/START version 3: clinical pharmacists are raising concerns.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

文件翻译

深度研究

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献