Seely Jean M, Eby Peter R, Yaffe Martin J
University of Ottawa, Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Breast Imaging. 2022 Apr 15;4(2):108-119. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab099.
Although the two Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) trials were performed 40 years ago, their negative findings continue to heavily influence screening policies around the world. These policies, based on underestimates of the mortality reduction attributable to mammography particularly for women in the 40-49-year age range, contribute to increased mortality and morbidity from breast cancer. This review summarizes principles of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and evaluates the compliance of the CNBSS1 and CNBSS2 RCTs in the context of these principles. We describe the fundamental flaws of the CNBSS trials, which failed to demonstrate mortality benefit of screening mammography and contribute to their being the only two outlier studies of eight screening mammography RCTs. The most significant flaws of the trials are (1) inadequate power to detect significant differences in breast cancer mortality; (2) very poor quality mammography with low sensitivity and cancer detection rates; (3) inclusion of women with symptoms of breast cancer; and (4) study design that allowed for violation of the randomization of the allocation process. Finally, we demonstrate that the conditions of the screening intervention in the CNBSS do not reflect the environment of modern population-based screening mammography programs.
尽管两项加拿大全国乳腺筛查研究(CNBSS)试验是在40年前进行的,但其阴性结果仍在很大程度上影响着全球的筛查政策。这些政策基于对乳腺X线摄影可降低死亡率的低估,尤其是对于40 - 49岁年龄段的女性,导致乳腺癌死亡率和发病率上升。本综述总结了随机对照试验(RCT)的原则,并在这些原则的背景下评估了CNBSS1和CNBSS2随机对照试验的合规性。我们描述了CNBSS试验的根本缺陷,这些缺陷未能证明乳腺X线摄影筛查的死亡率益处,并且使其成为八项乳腺X线摄影筛查随机对照试验中仅有的两项异常研究。试验最显著的缺陷是:(1)检测乳腺癌死亡率显著差异的能力不足;(2)乳腺X线摄影质量很差,敏感性和癌症检出率低;(3)纳入了有乳腺癌症状的女性;(4)研究设计允许违反分配过程的随机化。最后,我们证明CNBSS筛查干预的条件并不反映现代基于人群的乳腺X线摄影筛查项目的环境。