• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于采用单病例试验方法作为临床实践一部分的促进因素和障碍的定性研究:潜在挑战与实施挑战。

A qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers to adopting the N-of-1 trial methodology as part of clinical practice: potential versus implementation challenges.

机构信息

Data & Knowledge Engineering, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Data Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2318810. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2318810. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1080/17482631.2024.2318810
PMID:38417032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10903748/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate opinions among healthcare stakeholders whether implementation of the N-of-1 trial approach in clinical practice is a feasible way to optimize evidence-based treatment results for unique patients.

METHODS

We interviewed clinicians, researchers, and a patient advocate ( = 13) with an interest in or experience with N-of-1 trials on the following topics: experience with N-of-1, measurement, validity and reliability, informally gathered data usability, and influence on physician-patient relationship. Interviews were analysed using qualitative, thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The N-of-1 approach has the potential to shift the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, its application in clinical practice carries significant challenges in terms of logistics, time investment and acceptability. New skills will be required from patients and healthcare providers, which may alter the patient-physician relationship. The rise of consumer technology enabling self-measurement may leverage the uptake of N-of-1 approaches in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong belief that the N-of-1 approach has the potential to play a prominent role in transitioning the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, there are many barriers deeply ingrained in our healthcare system that hamper the uptake of the N-of-1 approach, making it momentarily only interesting for research purposes.

摘要

目的

调查医疗保健利益相关者对在临床实践中实施单病例试验方法的看法,以优化针对独特患者的基于证据的治疗结果是否可行。

方法

我们采访了对单病例试验有兴趣或有经验的临床医生、研究人员和患者权益倡导者(共 13 人),内容涉及单病例试验的经验、测量、有效性和可靠性、非正式收集数据的可用性以及对医患关系的影响。使用定性、主题分析对访谈进行了分析。

结果

单病例方法有可能将当前的医疗保健系统转向接受个性化医疗。然而,其在临床实践中的应用在后勤、时间投入和可接受性方面存在重大挑战。患者和医疗保健提供者需要新的技能,这可能会改变医患关系。能够进行自我测量的消费者技术的兴起可能会促进单病例方法在临床实践中的应用。

结论

人们强烈认为,单病例方法有可能在向个性化医疗的当前医疗保健系统转变中发挥重要作用。然而,我们的医疗保健系统中存在许多根深蒂固的障碍,阻碍了单病例方法的采用,使其目前仅对研究目的有意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/9d2c77783a1c/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/0e73af7e41e1/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/b58fa6b4d9df/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/fe88acb01501/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/1418a99793c1/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/9d2c77783a1c/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/0e73af7e41e1/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/b58fa6b4d9df/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/fe88acb01501/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/1418a99793c1/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156c/10903748/9d2c77783a1c/ZQHW_A_2318810_F0005_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
A qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers to adopting the N-of-1 trial methodology as part of clinical practice: potential versus implementation challenges.一项关于采用单病例试验方法作为临床实践一部分的促进因素和障碍的定性研究:潜在挑战与实施挑战。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2318810. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2318810. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
5
"They Can't Believe They're a Tiger": Insights from pediatric speech-language pathologist mobile app users and app designers.“他们不敢相信自己是只老虎”:来自儿科言语病理学家移动应用程序用户和应用程序设计师的见解。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1717-1737. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12898. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Promoting and hindering factors in the use of advance statements by Australian mental health clinicians.澳大利亚精神健康临床医生使用预立医疗指示的促进和阻碍因素。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;30(4):743-760. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12901. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Advance healthcare directives in mental health: A qualitative analysis from a Spanish healthcare professional's viewpoint.精神健康中的预先医疗指示:来自西班牙医疗保健专业人员视角的定性分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;26(7-8):223-232. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12539. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity.公民科学在促进健康公平中的作用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:215-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102856. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Individual point-of-care trials: a new approach to incorporate patient's preferences into personalized pragmatic clinical trials.个体化即时临床试验:一种将患者偏好纳入个性化实用临床试验的新方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:152-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist.
针对单病例试验的SPIRIT扩展与细化:2019年SPENT清单
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m122. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m122.
4
Practice-Based Research in Complementary Medicine: Could N-of-1 Trials Become the New Gold Standard?补充医学中基于实践的研究:单病例试验会成为新的金标准吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 8;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010015.
5
Personalized, Precision, and -of-One Medicine: A Clarification of Terminology and Concepts.个性化、精准和个体化医学:术语与概念的阐释
Perspect Biol Med. 2019;62(4):617-639. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2019.0036.
6
Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies.使用模拟研究比较汇总的单病例试验与平行和交叉随机对照试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;7(4):137. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040137.
7
The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.公民科学在健康和生物医学研究中的兴起。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859.
8
Maximizing the promise of citizen science to advance health and prevent disease.最大化公民科学在促进健康和预防疾病方面的潜力。
Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
9
Patient Perceptions of Their Own Data in mHealth Technology-Enabled N-of-1 Trials for Chronic Pain: Qualitative Study.在启用移动健康技术的慢性疼痛单病例试验中患者对自身数据的认知:定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Oct 11;6(10):e10291. doi: 10.2196/10291.
10
N-of-1 trials for assessing the effects of deprescribing medications on short-term clinical outcomes in older adults: a systematic review.评估减少老年人用药对短期临床结局影响的 N-of-1 试验:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 22.