• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过于拟人化而无法保持距离:社会心理距离对肉类偏好的影响。

Too anthropomorphized to keep distance: The role of social psychological distance on meat inclinations.

机构信息

School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.

Management College, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Appetite. 2024 May 1;196:107272. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107272. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107272
PMID:38417532
Abstract

Keeping a distance from food animals helps alleviate moral conflicts associated with meat consumption. Prior research on the 'meat paradox' has shown that physical distance from animals reduces negative emotional responses when consuming meat. However, even with physical distance, the presence of animals in meat advertisements and packaging can establish psychological contact. The impact of psychological distance on meat consumption and purchase inclinations has not been well explored. Through four experiments, we discovered that animal anthropomorphism psychologically brings consumers closer to food animals, resulting in reduced intentions to consume and purchase meat. Anthropomorphized animal images notably reduced social psychological distance for consumers with moderate to high (vs. lower) levels of anthropomorphic tendencies. Furthermore, the effect of anthropomorphism was influenced by moral self-efficacy. Specifically, when social psychological distance was reduced, consumers with higher (vs. lower) moral self-efficacy exhibited a significant decrease in their willingness to consume and purchase meat. These findings expand our understanding of the role of anthropomorphism in meat marketing, its limitations, and offer insights for sales strategies. Additionally, the research could inform public health policies on meat consumption, addressing environmental and ethical concerns tied to meat production amid growing worries about animal welfare.

摘要

与食用动物保持距离有助于减轻与肉类消费相关的道德冲突。先前关于“肉类悖论”的研究表明,与动物保持身体距离可以减少食用肉类时的负面情绪反应。然而,即使有身体距离,动物在肉类广告和包装中的存在也可以建立心理联系。心理距离对肉类消费和购买倾向的影响尚未得到充分探索。通过四项实验,我们发现动物拟人化在心理上将消费者与食用动物拉近,从而降低了他们食用和购买肉类的意愿。对于具有中等到高水平(与较低水平相比)拟人化倾向的消费者来说,拟人化的动物形象显著降低了他们的社会心理距离。此外,拟人化的效果受到道德自我效能感的影响。具体来说,当社会心理距离缩小时,道德自我效能感较高(与较低)的消费者明显减少了他们食用和购买肉类的意愿。这些发现扩展了我们对拟人化在肉类营销中的作用、其局限性的理解,并为销售策略提供了见解。此外,该研究可以为公共卫生政策提供有关肉类消费的信息,解决与肉类生产相关的环境和伦理问题,同时缓解人们对动物福利日益关注的问题。

相似文献

1
Too anthropomorphized to keep distance: The role of social psychological distance on meat inclinations.过于拟人化而无法保持距离:社会心理距离对肉类偏好的影响。
Appetite. 2024 May 1;196:107272. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107272. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
"Animals are friends, not food": Anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt.“动物是朋友,不是食物”:拟人化通过引起预期内疚感,导致对肉类消费的态度不那么有利。
Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:153-173. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
The effects of food anthropomorphism on consumer behavior: A systematic literature review with integrative framework and future research directions.食品拟人化对消费者行为的影响:系统文献综述及综合框架与未来研究方向
Appetite. 2023 Nov 1;190:107035. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107035. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Friends are not to be eaten: Children are reluctant to eat cookies that share physical and psychological human features due to their desire to relate to the food.朋友不可食:儿童由于希望与食物建立联系,因此不愿意食用具有身体和心理人类特征的饼干。
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105121. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105121. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Animals Like Us: Leveraging the Negativity Bias in Anthropomorphism to Reduce Beef Consumption.与我们相似的动物:利用拟人化中的消极偏见来减少牛肉消费。
Foods. 2021 Sep 10;10(9):2147. doi: 10.3390/foods10092147.
6
Inspiration or risk? How social media marketing of plant-based meat affects young people's purchase intention.灵感还是风险?植物性肉类的社交媒体营销如何影响年轻人的购买意愿。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:971107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971107. eCollection 2022.
7
Altruism and anti-anthropocentrism shape individual choice intentions for pro-environmental and ethical meat credence attributes.利他主义和反人类中心主义塑造了个体对环保和道德肉类认证属性的选择意愿。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294531. eCollection 2023.
8
The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?良好福利的代价:向消费者告知包装标签上的动物福利信息是否会影响他们的购买意愿?
Appetite. 2020 May 1;148:104577. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104577. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
How Social Identity Affects Green Food Purchase Intention: The Serial Mediation Effect of Green Perceived Value and Psychological Distance.社会身份如何影响绿色食品购买意愿:绿色感知价值与心理距离的链式中介效应
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;13(8):664. doi: 10.3390/bs13080664.
10
Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review.减少肉类消费以呼吁动物福利:一项荟萃分析和理论综述的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 6;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1264-5.