Suppr超能文献

利用神经网络进行白细胞的分割、特征提取和分类:一项比较研究

Segmentation, feature extraction and classification of leukocytes leveraging neural networks, a comparative study.

作者信息

Fang Tingxuan, Huang Xukun, Chen Xiao, Chen Deyong, Wang Junbo, Chen Jian

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cytometry A. 2024 Jul;105(7):536-546. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24832. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

The gold standard of leukocyte differentiation is a manual examination of blood smears, which is not only time and labor intensive but also susceptible to human error. As to automatic classification, there is still no comparative study of cell segmentation, feature extraction, and cell classification, where a variety of machine and deep learning models are compared with home-developed approaches. In this study, both traditional machine learning of K-means clustering versus deep learning of U-Net, U-Net + ResNet18, and U-Net + ResNet34 were used for cell segmentation, producing segmentation accuracies of 94.36% versus 99.17% for the dataset of CellaVision and 93.20% versus 98.75% for the dataset of BCCD, confirming that deep learning produces higher performance than traditional machine learning in leukocyte classification. In addition, a series of deep-learning approaches, including AlexNet, VGG16, and ResNet18, was adopted to conduct feature extraction and cell classification of leukocytes, producing classification accuracies of 91.31%, 97.83%, and 100% of CellaVision as well as 81.18%, 91.64% and 97.82% of BCCD, confirming the capability of the increased deepness of neural networks in leukocyte classification. As to the demonstrations, this study further conducted cell-type classification of ALL-IDB2 and PCB-HBC datasets, producing high accuracies of 100% and 98.49% among all literature, validating the deep learning model used in this study.

摘要

白细胞分化的金标准是对血涂片进行人工检查,这不仅耗时费力,而且容易出现人为误差。对于自动分类,目前尚无关于细胞分割、特征提取和细胞分类的比较研究,其中将各种机器学习和深度学习模型与自主研发的方法进行了比较。在本研究中,采用传统的K均值聚类机器学习方法与U-Net、U-Net+ResNet18和U-Net+ResNet34的深度学习方法进行细胞分割,在CellaVision数据集上的分割准确率分别为94.36%和99.17%,在BCCD数据集上分别为93.20%和98.75%,证实了深度学习在白细胞分类方面比传统机器学习具有更高的性能。此外,采用了一系列深度学习方法,包括AlexNet、VGG16和ResNet18,对白细胞进行特征提取和细胞分类,在CellaVision数据集上的分类准确率分别为91.31%、97.83%和100%,在BCCD数据集上分别为81.18%、91.64%和97.82%,证实了神经网络深度增加在白细胞分类中的能力。在演示方面,本研究进一步对ALL-IDB2和PCB-HBC数据集进行了细胞类型分类,在所有文献中产生了100%和98.49%的高精度,验证了本研究中使用的深度学习模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验