Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Department of Occupational Therapy, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Nov;19(8):2896-2903. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we tested the hypotheses that, in comparison with control participants receiving only self-study materials (SS group), caregivers of manual wheelchair users who additionally receive remote training (RT group) have greater total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) performance and confidence scores post-training and at follow-up; and that self-study and remote training each individually lead to such gains. We studied 23 dyads of wheelchair users and their caregivers. Caregivers in the SS group received a handbook and videorecording. Those in the RT group also received up to four real-time ("synchronous") sessions remotely. The WST-Q 5.1 was administered pre-training (T1), post-training (T2), and after a 3-month follow-up (T3). The mean total WST-Q scores of both groups rose slightly at each new assessment. For the T2-T1 and T3-T1 gains, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either WST-Q performance or WST-Q confidence. For performance, the T2-T1 gain was statistically significant for the RT group and the T3-T2 gain was statistically significant for the SS group. For both groups, the T3-T1 gains in performance were statistically significant with gains of 12.9% and 18.5% relative to baseline for the SS and RT groups. For confidence, only the T3-T1 gain for the SS group was statistically significant with a gain of 4.5% relative to baseline. Although less than the gains previously reported for in-person training, modest but important gains in total WST-Q performance scores can be achieved by self-study, with or without remote training.
NCT03856749.
与仅接受自学材料的对照组(SS 组)相比,手动轮椅使用者的照顾者在接受远程培训(RT 组)后,其轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)的总分和信心评分更高,且随访时仍保持较高水平;同时,自学和远程培训各自都能带来这种提升。我们研究了 23 对轮椅使用者及其照顾者。SS 组的照顾者接受了手册和录像带。RT 组的照顾者还接受了最多 4 次实时(“同步”)远程培训。在培训前(T1)、培训后(T2)和 3 个月随访后(T3),使用 WST-Q5.1 进行评估。两个组的 WST-Q 总分在每次新评估时均略有上升。对于 T2-T1 和 T3-T1 的增益,在 WST-Q 表现和 WST-Q 信心方面,两组之间均无统计学差异。在表现方面,RT 组的 T2-T1 增益具有统计学意义,SS 组的 T3-T2 增益具有统计学意义。对于两个组,SS 组的 T3-T1 表现增益具有统计学意义,与基线相比,分别增加了 12.9%和 18.5%。对于信心,仅 SS 组的 T3-T1 增益具有统计学意义,与基线相比增加了 4.5%。尽管与面对面培训相比,这些增益较小,但通过自学或结合远程培训,可以实现总 WST-Q 表现评分的适度但重要的提升。
NCT03856749。