• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能培训:一项比较自学和远程培训的随机对照试验。

Wheelchair skills training for caregivers of manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial comparing self-study and remote training.

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Nov;19(8):2896-2903. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272
PMID:38420947
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we tested the hypotheses that, in comparison with control participants receiving only self-study materials (SS group), caregivers of manual wheelchair users who additionally receive remote training (RT group) have greater total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) performance and confidence scores post-training and at follow-up; and that self-study and remote training each individually lead to such gains. We studied 23 dyads of wheelchair users and their caregivers. Caregivers in the SS group received a handbook and videorecording. Those in the RT group also received up to four real-time ("synchronous") sessions remotely. The WST-Q 5.1 was administered pre-training (T1), post-training (T2), and after a 3-month follow-up (T3). The mean total WST-Q scores of both groups rose slightly at each new assessment. For the T2-T1 and T3-T1 gains, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either WST-Q performance or WST-Q confidence. For performance, the T2-T1 gain was statistically significant for the RT group and the T3-T2 gain was statistically significant for the SS group. For both groups, the T3-T1 gains in performance were statistically significant with gains of 12.9% and 18.5% relative to baseline for the SS and RT groups. For confidence, only the T3-T1 gain for the SS group was statistically significant with a gain of 4.5% relative to baseline. Although less than the gains previously reported for in-person training, modest but important gains in total WST-Q performance scores can be achieved by self-study, with or without remote training.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03856749.

摘要

本单盲随机对照试验旨在验证以下两个假设

与仅接受自学材料的对照组(SS 组)相比,手动轮椅使用者的照顾者在接受远程培训(RT 组)后,其轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)的总分和信心评分更高,且随访时仍保持较高水平;同时,自学和远程培训各自都能带来这种提升。我们研究了 23 对轮椅使用者及其照顾者。SS 组的照顾者接受了手册和录像带。RT 组的照顾者还接受了最多 4 次实时(“同步”)远程培训。在培训前(T1)、培训后(T2)和 3 个月随访后(T3),使用 WST-Q5.1 进行评估。两个组的 WST-Q 总分在每次新评估时均略有上升。对于 T2-T1 和 T3-T1 的增益,在 WST-Q 表现和 WST-Q 信心方面,两组之间均无统计学差异。在表现方面,RT 组的 T2-T1 增益具有统计学意义,SS 组的 T3-T2 增益具有统计学意义。对于两个组,SS 组的 T3-T1 表现增益具有统计学意义,与基线相比,分别增加了 12.9%和 18.5%。对于信心,仅 SS 组的 T3-T1 增益具有统计学意义,与基线相比增加了 4.5%。尽管与面对面培训相比,这些增益较小,但通过自学或结合远程培训,可以实现总 WST-Q 表现评分的适度但重要的提升。

注册号

NCT03856749。

相似文献

1
Wheelchair skills training for caregivers of manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial comparing self-study and remote training.照顾手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能培训:一项比较自学和远程培训的随机对照试验。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Nov;19(8):2896-2903. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Effectiveness of a Wheelchair Skills Training Program for Powered Wheelchair Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能培训项目的有效性:一项随机对照试验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):2017-26.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
Efficacy and retention of the French-Canadian version of the wheelchair skills training program for manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.法语版轮椅技能训练计划对手动轮椅使用者的疗效和保留率:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):940-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Skills Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.脊髓损伤患者群体轮椅技能训练的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1777-1784.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Influence of Peer-led Wheelchair Training on Wheelchair Skills and Participation in Older Adults: Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.同伴主导的轮椅训练对老年人轮椅技能和参与的影响:一项随机对照可行性试验的临床结局。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1023-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Effectiveness of the miWe Simulator Training on Powered Wheelchair-driving Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.miWe 模拟器训练对电动轮椅驾驶技能的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep;104(9):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力与表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Effects of wheelchair skills training during peer-led Active Rehabilitation Camps for people with spinal cord injury in Poland: a cohort study.波兰脊髓损伤人群在同伴主导的积极康复营中进行轮椅技能训练的效果:一项队列研究。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Nov;62(11):651-657. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01034-0. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
9
Extent to Which Caregivers Enhance the Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Confidence of Power Wheelchair Users: A Cross-Sectional Study.照顾者在多大程度上增强了电动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力和信心:一项横断面研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;99(7):1295-1302.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.针对社区使用手动轮椅者的轮椅技能培训:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.300.