• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查伦敦“BP@home”计划成功实施的障碍和促进因素:初级保健视角。

Investigating barriers & facilitators for the successful implementation of the BP@home initiative in London: Primary care perspectives.

机构信息

Self-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kindgom.

NIHR ARC North West London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0298898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298898. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0298898
PMID:38422101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10903909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of a national policy of shielding to safeguard clinically vulnerable patients. To ensure consistent care for high-risk patients with hypertension, NHS England introduced the BP@home initiative to enable patients to self-monitor their blood pressure by providing them with blood pressure monitors. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the initiative based on the experience and perspectives of programme managers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in its implementation in London.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted five semi-structured focus groups and one individual interview with a total of 20 healthcare professionals involved at different levels and stages in the BP@home initiative across four of the five London Integrated Care Systems (ICSs). All focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically following the Framework Method. Respondents reported being challenged by the lack of adequate IT, human and financial resources to support the substantial additional workload associated with the programme. These issues resulted in and reinforced the differential engagement capacities of PCNs, practices and patients, thus raising equity concerns among respondents. However respondents also identified several facilitators, including the integration of the eligibility criteria into the electronic health record (EHR), especially when combined with the adoption of practice-specific, pragmatic and opportunistic approaches to the onboarding of patients. Respondents also recommended the provision of blood pressure monitors (BPMs) on prescription, additional funding and training based on needs assessment, the incorporation of BP@home into daily practice and simplification of IT tools, and finally the adoption of a person-centred care approach. Contextualised using the second iteration of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), these findings support key evidence-based recommendations to help streamline the implementation of the BP@home initiative in London's primary care setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Programs such as BP@Home are likely to become more common in primary care. To successfully support HCPs' aim to care for their hypertensive patients, their implementation must be accompanied by additional financial, human and training resources, as well as supported task-shifting for capacity building. Future studies should explore the perspectives of HCPs based in other parts of the UK as well as patients' experiences with remote monitoring of blood pressure.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行导致实施了国家保护政策,以保护临床脆弱的患者。为确保为高血压高危患者提供一致的护理,NHS 英格兰推出了 BP@home 计划,通过为患者提供血压监测仪,使他们能够自我监测血压。本研究旨在根据参与伦敦该计划实施的项目管理人员和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的经验和观点,确定该计划实施的障碍和促进因素。

方法和发现

我们对来自伦敦五个综合保健系统(ICS)中四个 ICS 的不同级别和阶段参与 BP@home 计划的共 20 名医疗保健专业人员进行了五次半结构化焦点小组和一次个人访谈。所有焦点小组和访谈都进行了录音,并根据框架方法进行了主题分析。受访者报告说,由于缺乏足够的 IT、人力和财务资源来支持与该计划相关的大量额外工作量,他们面临着挑战。这些问题导致并加强了 PCN、实践和患者的不同参与能力,从而引起了受访者的公平性问题。然而,受访者还确定了一些促进因素,包括将资格标准纳入电子健康记录(EHR),特别是与采用针对特定实践的务实和机会主义方法相结合时,可提高患者的参与度。受访者还建议根据需要评估提供处方血压监测仪(BPM)、额外资金和培训,将 BP@home 纳入日常实践、简化 IT 工具,并最终采用以患者为中心的护理方法。利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的第二迭代对这些发现进行了背景化处理,这些发现支持了关键的循证建议,有助于简化伦敦初级保健环境中 BP@home 计划的实施。

结论

像 BP@Home 这样的计划在初级保健中可能会越来越普遍。为了成功支持 HCP 照顾高血压患者的目标,他们的实施必须伴随着额外的财务、人力和培训资源,以及为能力建设进行支持性的任务转移。未来的研究应探讨英国其他地区 HCP 以及患者对远程血压监测的体验的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b5/10903909/e1665c840a1f/pone.0298898.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b5/10903909/e1665c840a1f/pone.0298898.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b5/10903909/e1665c840a1f/pone.0298898.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating barriers & facilitators for the successful implementation of the BP@home initiative in London: Primary care perspectives.调查伦敦“BP@home”计划成功实施的障碍和促进因素:初级保健视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0298898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298898. eCollection 2024.
2
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
3
Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study.第二产程实施直立位实践方案的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Nov 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.15927.
4
5
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
6
[The innovation characteristics of person-centred care as perceived by healthcare professionals: an interview study employing a deductive-inductive content analysis guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research.医护人员感知的以患者为中心的护理的创新特征:采用整合实施研究框架指导的演绎归纳内容分析的访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06942-y.
7
Exploring barriers and facilitators to integrated hypertension-HIV management in Ugandan HIV clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)探索乌干达艾滋病诊所中高血压与艾滋病综合管理的障碍和促进因素。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 May 4;1:45. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00033-5. eCollection 2020.
8
Facilitators and barriers to optimal home blood pressure management in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary care facility in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative research study.在尼日利亚阿布贾的一家三级保健机构中,妊娠高血压疾病患者的最佳家庭血压管理的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 6;23(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09976-6.
9
Using implementation mapping for the adoption and implementation of in community health centers.运用实施映射促进社区卫生中心采纳和实施 。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;10:928148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.928148. eCollection 2022.
10
Barriers and facilitators to national guideline implementation for palliative cancer care in a Danish cross-sectoral healthcare setting: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences.丹麦跨部门医疗保健环境中实施姑息治疗癌症护理国家指南的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健专业人员经验的定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6267. doi: 10.1002/pon.6267. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a shared definition of self-driven healthcare to enhance the current healthcare delivery paradigm.制定自我驱动型医疗保健的共享定义,以提升当前的医疗服务模式。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Nov;115(11):424-428. doi: 10.1177/01410768221136245.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Risk of COVID-19 in shielded and nursing care home patients: a cohort study in general practice.
防护隔离及养老院患者感染新冠病毒的风险:一项全科医疗队列研究
BJGP Open. 2021 Dec 14;5(6). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0081. Print 2021.
4
Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: An International Expert Position Paper.证据和建议:利用远程医疗管理动脉高血压——国际专家立场文件。
Hypertension. 2020 Nov;76(5):1368-1383. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15873. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring at Home: A Joint Policy Statement From the American Heart Association and American Medical Association.家庭自我血压监测:美国心脏协会和美国医学协会联合政策声明。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 28;142(4):e42-e63. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000803. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study.大规模远程监控在初级保健中的高血压应用:一项实施研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jun 17;17(6):e1003124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003124. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
The primary care response to COVID-19 in England's National Health Service.英国国民医疗服务体系中初级医疗对新冠疫情的应对措施。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jun;113(6):208-210. doi: 10.1177/0141076820931452.
8
E-Health in Hypertension Management: an Insight into the Current and Future Role of Blood Pressure Telemonitoring.电子健康在高血压管理中的作用:血压远程监测的现状和未来角色分析。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Jun 6;22(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01056-y.
9
Income-based inequalities in hypertension and in undiagnosed hypertension: analysis of Health Survey for England data.基于收入的高血压和未确诊高血压的不平等:对英格兰健康调查数据的分析。
J Hypertens. 2020 May;38(5):912-924. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002350.
10
Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the Sustainable Development Goals.投资于非传染性疾病的预防和管理,以推进可持续发展目标。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):2029-2035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30667-6. Epub 2018 Apr 5.