Homma Yasuhiro, Zhuang Xu, Watari Taiji, Hayashi Koju, Baba Tomonori, Kamath Atul, Ishijima Muneaki
Department of Medicine for Orthopaedics and Motor Organ, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):154-161. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0160.R1.
It is important to analyze objectively the hammering sound in cup press-fit technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in order to better understand the change of the sound during impaction. We hypothesized that a specific characteristic would present in a hammering sound with successful fixation. We designed the study to quantitatively investigate the acoustic characteristics during cementless cup impaction in THA.
In 52 THAs performed between November 2018 and April 2022, the acoustic parameters of the hammering sound of 224 impacts of successful press-fit fixation, and 55 impacts of unsuccessful press-fit fixation, were analyzed. The successful fixation was defined if the following two criteria were met: 1) intraoperatively, the stability of the cup was retained after manual application of the torque test; and 2) at one month postoperatively, the cup showed no translation on radiograph. Each hammering sound was converted to sound pressures in 24 frequency bands by fast Fourier transform analysis. Basic patient characteristics were assessed as potential contributors to the hammering sound.
The median sound pressure (SP) of successful fixation at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz was higher than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0694 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.04721 to 0.09576) vs 0.05425 (IQR 0.03047 to 0.06803), p < 0.001). The median SP of successful fixation at 3.5 to 4.0 kHz and 4.0 to 4.5 kHz was lower than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0812 (IQR 0.05631 to 0.01161) vs 0.1233 (IQR 0.0730 to 0.1449), p < 0.001; and 0.0891 (IQR 0.0526 to 0.0891) vs 0.0885 (IQR 0.0716 to 0.1048); p < 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant positive relationship between body weight and SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that the SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz was independently associated with the successful fixation.
The frequency bands of 0.5 to 1.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz were the key to distinguish the sound characteristics between successful and unsuccessful press-fit cup fixation.
客观分析全髋关节置换术(THA)中髋臼压配技术的锤击声,以便更好地了解压入过程中声音的变化,这很重要。我们假设成功固定时的锤击声会呈现出特定特征。我们设计本研究以定量调查THA中无水泥髋臼压入过程中的声学特征。
在2018年11月至2022年4月期间进行的52例THA中,分析了224次成功压配固定的锤击声和55次未成功压配固定的锤击声的声学参数。如果满足以下两个标准,则定义为成功固定:1)术中,手动施加扭矩测试后髋臼保持稳定;2)术后1个月,X线片显示髋臼无移位。通过快速傅里叶变换分析将每次锤击声转换为24个频带中的声压。评估基本患者特征作为锤击声的潜在影响因素。
成功固定在0.5至1.0kHz时的中位声压(SP)高于未成功固定的情况(0.0694(四分位间距(IQR)0.04721至0.09576)对0.05425(IQR 0.03047至0.06803),p<0.001)。成功固定在3.5至4.0kHz和4.0至4.5kHz时的中位SP低于未成功固定的情况(0.0812(IQR 0.05631至0.1161)对0.1233(IQR 0.0730至0.1449),p<0.001;以及0.0891(IQR 0.0526至0.0891)对0.0885(IQR 0.0716至0.1048);p分别<0.001)。体重与0.5至1.0kHz时的SP之间存在统计学上显著的正相关(p<0.001)。多变量分析表明,0.5至1.0kHz和3.5至4.0kHz时的SP与成功固定独立相关。
0.5至1.0kHz和3.5至4.0kHz频带是区分髋臼压配固定成功与失败时声音特征的关键。