INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Université Paris Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S Shaw Ln, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Feb 29;56(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00876-9.
Genetic merit, or breeding values as referred to in livestock and crop breeding programs, is one of the keys to the successful selection of animals in commercial farming systems. The developments in statistical methods during the twentieth century and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip technologies in the twenty-first century have revolutionized agricultural production, by allowing highly accurate predictions of breeding values for selection candidates at a very early age. Nonetheless, for many breeding populations, realized accuracies of predicted breeding values (PBV) remain below the theoretical maximum, even when the reference population is sufficiently large, and SNPs included in the model are in sufficient linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the quantitative trait locus (QTL). This is particularly noticeable over generations, as we observe the so-called erosion of the effects of SNPs due to recombinations, accompanied by the erosion of the accuracy of prediction. While accurately quantifying the erosion at the individual SNP level is a difficult and unresolved task, quantifying the erosion of the accuracy of prediction is a more tractable problem. In this paper, we describe a method that uses the relationship between reference and target populations to calculate expected values for the accuracies of predicted breeding values for non-phenotyped individuals accounting for erosion. The accuracy of the expected values was evaluated through simulations, and a further evaluation was performed on real data.
Using simulations, we empirically confirmed that our expected values for the accuracy of PBV accounting for erosion were able to correctly determine the prediction accuracy of breeding values for non-phenotyped individuals. When comparing the expected to the realized accuracies of PBV with real data, only one out of the four traits evaluated presented accuracies that were significantly higher than the expected, approaching .
We defined an index of genetic correlation between reference and target populations, which summarizes the expected overall erosion due to differences in allele frequencies and LD patterns between populations. We used this correlation along with a trait's heritability to derive expected values for the accuracy ( ) of PBV accounting for the erosion, and demonstrated that our derived is a reliable metric.
遗传优势,或在畜牧业和作物育种计划中称为育种值,是商业养殖系统中成功选择动物的关键之一。二十世纪统计方法的发展和二十一世纪单核苷酸多态性(SNP)芯片技术的发展,通过允许对非常早期的候选物进行高度准确的育种值预测,彻底改变了农业生产。尽管如此,对于许多育种群体而言,即使参考群体足够大且模型中包含的 SNP 与数量性状基因座(QTL)充分连锁不平衡(LD),预测育种值(PBV)的实际准确性仍低于理论最大值。这在几代人中尤为明显,因为我们观察到由于重组而导致 SNP 效应的所谓侵蚀,同时预测的准确性也在下降。虽然准确量化个体 SNP 水平的侵蚀是一项困难且未解决的任务,但量化预测准确性的侵蚀是一个更易于处理的问题。在本文中,我们描述了一种使用参考群体和目标群体之间的关系来计算非表型个体的预测 PBV 准确性的预期值的方法,该方法考虑了侵蚀的影响。通过模拟评估了预期值的准确性,并在真实数据上进行了进一步评估。
通过模拟,我们从经验上证实了我们的预期值能够正确确定非表型个体的 PBV 预测准确性。在将预期的 PBV 准确性与真实数据进行比较时,评估的四个性状中只有一个的准确性显著高于预期值,接近.
我们定义了参考群体和目标群体之间的遗传相关性指数,该指数总结了由于群体之间等位基因频率和 LD 模式的差异导致的整体预期侵蚀。我们使用此相关性以及性状的遗传力来推导出考虑侵蚀的 PBV 准确性的预期值( ),并证明我们推导出的 是一种可靠的指标。