Zhan Zehui, He Luyao, Zhong Xuanyan
School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;15:1287082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287082. eCollection 2024.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of problem-solving pedagogy on individual students' creativity in different teaching contexts and conditions, and to examine the role of moderating variables that may affect the overall effect size. The study screened 19 relevant studies from the Web of Science for inclusion in the meta-analysis, and extracted 77 effect sizes from these studies that could be used in the meta-analysis. The study first explored the relationship between problem-solving pedagogy and the development of learner creativity, and further analysis focused on moderating variables to investigate the effects of instructional method, grouping method, grade level, problem-solving scaffolding, source of problems, the application of thinking tools, and the application of technology. The results showed that problem-solving pedagogy enhances students' creativity, while at the same time, among the sources of problems, student-discovered problems are most conducive to creativity stimulation, while teacher-determined problems and problems that lead to student discovery are less effective in terms of promoting creativity. Among the grouping methods, heterogeneous grouping can better utilize the creativity cultivation effect of the problem-solving pedagogy than random grouping and homogeneous grouping. Among the different levels of grades, learners in elementary school are better able to gain creativity under the influence of problem-solving pedagogy than learners in middle school, high school, college, and those in on-the-job learning. However, this study did not reveal any significant benefits for creativity enhancement under the four conditions of instructional method, problem-solving scaffolding, thinking tools-assisted, or technology. The results of this study clarify the importance of problem-solving pedagogy for creativity development, and also reveal the actual effects of the various ways of applying problem-solving pedagogy on creativity development as well as the problems that exist, which provides inspiration for how to better utilize problem-solving pedagogy in the future.
本研究旨在探讨问题解决教学法在不同教学情境和条件下对个体学生创造力的影响,并检验可能影响总体效应量的调节变量的作用。该研究从科学网筛选了19项相关研究纳入元分析,并从这些研究中提取了77个可用于元分析的效应量。该研究首先探讨了问题解决教学法与学习者创造力发展之间的关系,进一步分析聚焦于调节变量,以研究教学方法、分组方法、年级水平、问题解决支架、问题来源、思维工具的应用以及技术的应用的影响。结果表明,问题解决教学法能提高学生的创造力,同时,在问题来源中,学生发现的问题最有利于激发创造力,而教师确定的问题和引导学生发现的问题在促进创造力方面效果较差。在分组方法中,异质分组比随机分组和同质分组能更好地利用问题解决教学法的创造力培养效果。在不同年级水平中,小学生在问题解决教学法的影响下比中学生、高中生、大学生和在职学习者更能获得创造力。然而,本研究未发现教学方法、问题解决支架、思维工具辅助或技术这四种条件下对创造力提升有任何显著益处。本研究结果阐明了问题解决教学法对创造力发展的重要性,也揭示了应用问题解决教学法的各种方式对创造力发展的实际效果以及存在的问题,为未来如何更好地利用问题解决教学法提供了启示。