Barrett Margaret S, Creech Andrea, Zhukov Katie
Sir Zelman Cowen School of Music and Performance, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Schulich School of Music, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:713445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713445. eCollection 2021.
Studies of creativity emerging from cultural psychology and social psychology perspectives challenge individualist conceptions of creativity to argue that social interaction, communication, and collaboration are key elements in creativity. In recent work creative collaboration has been proposed to be "distributed" between audiences, materials, embodied actions, and the historico-socio-cultural affordances of the creative activity and environment, thus expanding the potentialities of creative collaboration beyond instances of direct human interaction and engagement. Music performance, improvisation and composition may be viewed as exemplary "laboratories" of creative collaboration through the combined elements of audiences, materials, embodied actions and historico-socio-cultural affordances and constraints. This article reports the findings of a systematic literature review of creative collaboration and collaborative creativity in music. We sought to identify what has been currently investigated in relation to these terms and concepts in music, with what methodologies and in what settings. Findings indicate that studies were undertaken in higher education, professional development and professional practice predominantly, leading to an emergent phenomenon of interest, collaborative creative learning. Musical genres were jazz, popular, western classical, contemporary and world musics across the musical processes of composing, improvising and performing. Studies in higher education and professional development settings focused on identifying those practices that supported learning rather than the nature of collaborative creative approaches or the outcomes of creative collaboration. Participants were primarily male, with small sample sizes. Methodologies were largely qualitative with an emphasis on case study using observation, interview and reflective diary methods. Further areas for research include: the investigation of gendered approaches to creative collaboration, collaborative creativity, and collaborative creative learning; the use of more diverse research methodologies and methods and techniques including large-scale quantitative studies and arts-based and arts-led approaches; and the investigation of more diverse music settings.
从文化心理学和社会心理学视角开展的创造力研究,对个人主义的创造力概念提出了挑战,认为社会互动、交流与合作是创造力的关键要素。在近期的研究中,有人提出创造性合作“分布”于受众、材料、具身行动以及创造性活动与环境的历史社会文化条件之间,从而将创造性合作的潜力扩展到直接人际互动和参与之外的情况。音乐表演、即兴创作和作曲可被视为创造性合作的典型“实验室”,它们融合了受众、材料、具身行动以及历史社会文化条件与限制等要素。本文报告了一项关于音乐领域创造性合作与合作创造力的系统文献综述的结果。我们试图确定目前在音乐领域针对这些术语和概念进行了哪些研究、采用了何种方法以及在何种背景下进行的研究。研究结果表明,这些研究主要是在高等教育、专业发展和专业实践领域开展的,由此产生了一个新的研究热点——合作性创造性学习。音乐类型涵盖爵士、流行、西方古典、当代和世界音乐等,涉及作曲、即兴创作和表演等音乐过程。高等教育和专业发展领域的研究主要聚焦于确定那些支持学习的实践,而非合作性创造性方法的本质或创造性合作的成果。参与者主要为男性,样本规模较小。研究方法大多为定性研究,重点是采用观察、访谈和反思日记等方法的案例研究。进一步的研究领域包括:对创造性合作、合作创造力和合作性创造性学习的性别化方法进行研究;运用更多样化的研究方法,包括大规模定量研究以及基于艺术和以艺术为主导的方法;以及对更多样化的音乐背景进行研究。