Suppr超能文献

骨科肿瘤学中的股骨近端大假体:标准化术后康复方案的评估

Proximal Femur Megaprostheses in Orthopedic Oncology: Evaluation of a Standardized Post-operative Rehabilitation Protocol.

作者信息

Andreani Lorenzo, Ipponi Edoardo, Falcinelli Federico, Cordoni Martina, Bechini Elena, Vannucci Lorenzo, D'Arienzo Antonio, Capanna Rodolfo

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2024 Feb 8;58(3):323-329. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01092-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reconstructions of the proximal femur after massive resections represent one of the main challenges in orthopedic oncology. Among the possible treatments, megaprostheses represent one of the most used and reliable reconstructive approaches. Although literature about their outcomes has flourished through the last decades, a consensus rehabilitative treatment is still far from being established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the functional results of all our oncologic cases treated between 2016 and 2022 that could follow our standardized post-operative rehabilitative approach, consisting in progressive hip mobilization and early weight-bearing.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases were included in our study. On average, their hospitalization lasted 15.1 days. The seated position was achieved on average within 3.7 days after surgery, the standing position reached 5.4 after surgery, while assisted deambulation was started 6.4 days after surgery. After a mean post-operative follow-up of 44.0 months, our patients' mean MSTS score was 23.2 (10-30). Our data suggested a statistically significant inverse linear correlation between post-operative functionality and patients' age, resection length, and the start of deambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

A correct rehabilitation, focused on early mobilization and progressive weight-bearing, is crucial to maximize patients' post-operative functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

股骨近端大块切除后的重建是骨肿瘤学的主要挑战之一。在可能的治疗方法中,巨型假体是最常用且可靠的重建方法之一。尽管在过去几十年中关于其治疗结果的文献大量涌现,但仍远未建立起一致的康复治疗方案。

材料与方法

我们评估了2016年至2022年间接受治疗的所有肿瘤病例的功能结果,这些病例均遵循我们标准化的术后康复方法,包括逐步进行髋关节活动和早期负重。

结果

我们的研究纳入了22例病例。平均住院时间为15.1天。术后平均3.7天达到坐位,5.4天达到站立位,术后6.4天开始辅助行走。术后平均随访44.0个月后,患者的平均肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)评分为23.2(10 - 30)。我们的数据表明,术后功能与患者年龄、切除长度以及行走开始时间之间存在统计学上显著的负线性相关性。

结论

正确的康复治疗,重点是早期活动和逐步负重,对于最大化患者术后功能结果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee20/10899131/30810338b214/43465_2023_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Proximal Femur Megaprostheses in Orthopedic Oncology: Evaluation of a Standardized Post-operative Rehabilitation Protocol.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Feb 8;58(3):323-329. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01092-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Functional outcome and multidimensional evaluation of patients with Mutars® reconstructions post lower limb tumor resection and rehabilitation: preliminary results.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Mar-Apr;33(2 Suppl. 1):155-161. XIX Congresso Nazionale S.I.C.O.O.P. Societa' Italiana Chirurghi Ortopedici Dell'ospedalita' Privata Accreditata.
5
Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 6;22(Suppl 2):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05726-7.
7
What are the functional outcomes of endoprosthestic reconstructions after tumor resection?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):812-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3655-1.
8
Survival of modern knee tumor megaprostheses: failures, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):891-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3699-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic Floor Functionality and Outcomes in Oncologic Patients Treated with Pelvic Bone Resection.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;17(16):2629. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162629.
2
Outcome of Endoprosthetic Hip Reconstruction Following Resection of Malignant Bone Tumors.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;16(16):2890. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162890.

本文引用的文献

1
The major proximal femoral defects: megaprosthesis in non oncological patients - A case series.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jan 28;15:38432. doi: 10.52965/001c.38432. eCollection 2023.
2
Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 6;22(Suppl 2):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05726-7.
3
Megaprosthesis Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur following Bone Tumour Resection: When Do We Need the Cup?
Hip Pelvis. 2021 Sep;33(3):147-153. doi: 10.5371/hp.2021.33.3.147. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Proximal femoral reconstruction with modular megaprostheses in non-oncological patients.
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2531-2542. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05080-8. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Non-neoplastic indications and outcomes of the proximal and distal femur megaprosthesis: a critical review.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Apr 9;32(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00034-7.
7
Fracture repair in the elderly: Clinical and experimental considerations.
Injury. 2019 Jun;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-S65. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 11.
8
Lower Extremity Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun 15;26(12):e249-e257. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00218.
9
Complications and survival of megaprostheses after resection of bone metastases.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31(4 suppl 1):43-50.
10
Increasing age and tear size reduce rotator cuff repair healing rate at 1 year.
Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec;88(6):606-611. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1370844. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验