Robles Marta, Ramos-Grille Irene, Hervás Amaia, Duran-Tauleria Enric, Galiano-Landeira Jordi, Wormwood Jolie B, Falter-Wagner Christine M, Chanes Lorena
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;24(2):100440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100440. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Autism has been investigated through traditional emotion recognition paradigms, merely investigating accuracy, thereby constraining how potential differences across autistic and control individuals may be observed, identified, and described. Moreover, the of emotional facial expression information for social functioning in autism is of relevance to provide a deeper understanding of the condition.
Adult autistic individuals ( = 34) and adult control individuals ( = 34) were assessed with a social perception behavioral paradigm exploring facial expression predictions and their impact on social evaluation.
Autistic individuals held less stereotypical predictions than controls. Importantly, despite such differences in predictions, the of such predictions for social evaluation did not differ significantly between groups, as autistic individuals relied on their predictions to evaluate others to the same extent as controls.
These results help to understand how autistic individuals perceive social stimuli and evaluate others, revealing a deviation from stereotypicality beyond which social evaluation strategies may be intact.
背景/目的:自闭症已通过传统的情绪识别范式进行研究,仅调查准确性,从而限制了观察、识别和描述自闭症个体与对照个体之间潜在差异的方式。此外,自闭症中情绪面部表情信息对社交功能的作用,对于更深入理解该病症具有重要意义。
采用一种社会认知行为范式对34名成年自闭症个体和34名成年对照个体进行评估,该范式探究面部表情预测及其对社会评价的影响。
自闭症个体的刻板预测比对照组少。重要的是,尽管预测存在差异,但两组之间此类预测对社会评价的影响并无显著差异,因为自闭症个体与对照组一样,在同等程度上依赖其预测来评价他人。
这些结果有助于理解自闭症个体如何感知社会刺激并评价他人,揭示出与刻板模式的偏差,而在此偏差之外,社会评价策略可能是完整的。