Suppr超能文献

西洛他唑为基础的双重抗血小板治疗用于无症状性颈动脉疾病的缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet treatment in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Thiraworawong Thon, Pathonsmith Chadawan

机构信息

Division of Vascular Neurology, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 15;15:1362124. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1362124. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid artery disease remains controversial. Data on the efficacy of antiplatelet agents and stroke outcomes are limited. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic carotid artery disease.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care setting and included baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of participants. The study included patients who had experienced first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis, with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis refers to stenosis in patients without neurological symptoms referable to the carotid arteries. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model based on participants' baseline characteristics. The efficacy outcome was the composite outcome of recurrent ischemic events and vascular-related death in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The safety outcome was the occurrence of hemorrhagic complications such as intracranial hemorrhages or extracranial hemorrhages. The effectiveness of dual therapy compared to monotherapy was evaluated at various time points following the initiation of antiplatelet treatment.

RESULTS

This study included 516 patients with a 1-year follow-up period. At 1 year, composite events occurred in 10 (6.3%) patients in the dual antiplatelet group compared with 12 (7.6%) in the single antiplatelet group (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90;  = 0.024). Extracranial hemorrhage occurred in 12 (7.6%) patients in the dual antiplatelet group compared with nine (5.7%) in the single antiplatelet group (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.48;  = 0.017). No intracranial hemorrhages were observed in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis who received cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy had a lower risk of composite events but a higher risk of minor extracranial hemorrhage than those who received a single antiplatelet agent.

摘要

背景

无症状性动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。关于抗血小板药物疗效及卒中结局的数据有限。本研究旨在探讨西洛他唑为基础的双联抗血小板治疗对缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作合并无症状性颈动脉疾病患者的疗效及安全性。

方法

本回顾性队列研究在三级医疗机构开展,纳入参与者的基线特征及临床结局。研究纳入首次发生缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作且伴有无症状性动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄的患者,最短随访期为1年。无症状性颈动脉狭窄指无颈动脉相关神经症状患者的颈动脉狭窄。采用基于参与者基线特征的逻辑回归模型估算倾向得分。疗效结局为缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作合并无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者复发性缺血事件及血管相关死亡的复合结局。安全性结局为颅内出血或颅外出血等出血性并发症的发生情况。在启动抗血小板治疗后的不同时间点评估双联治疗与单药治疗相比的有效性。

结果

本研究纳入516例患者,随访期1年。1年时,双联抗血小板组10例(6.3%)患者发生复合事件,单联抗血小板组为12例(7.6%)(风险比,0.74;95%置信区间,0.61 - 0.90;P = 0.024)。双联抗血小板组12例(7.6%)患者发生颅外出血,单联抗血小板组为9例(5.7%)(风险比,1.35;95%置信区间,1.13 - 1.48;P = 0.017)。该队列中未观察到颅内出血。

结论

与接受单药抗血小板治疗的患者相比,接受以西洛他唑为基础的双联抗血小板治疗的无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者发生复合事件的风险较低,但发生轻微颅外出血的风险较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9c/10902642/1a49a70e2f9d/fneur-15-1362124-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验