• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推动学术活动包容性边界的十条简单规则。

Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Deep Learning Indaba, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 1;20(3):e1011797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011797. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011797
PMID:38427633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10906823/
Abstract

Inclusion at academic events is facing increased scrutiny as the communities these events serve raise their expectations for who can practically attend. Active efforts in recent years to bring more diversity to academic events have brought progress and created momentum. However, we must reflect on these efforts and determine which underrepresented groups are being disadvantaged. Inclusion at academic events is important to ensure diversity of discourse and opinion, to help build networks, and to avoid academic siloing. All of these contribute to the development of a robust and resilient academic field. We have developed these Ten Simple Rules both to amplify the voices that have been speaking out and to celebrate the progress of many Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity practices that continue to drive the organisation of academic events. The Rules aim to raise awareness as well as provide actionable suggestions and tools to support these initiatives further. This aims to support academic organisations such as the Deep Learning Indaba, Neuromatch Academy, the IBRO-Simons Computational Neuroscience Imbizo, Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), Arabs in Neuroscience, FAIRPoints, and OLS (formerly Open Life Science). This article is a call to action for organisers to reevaluate the impact and reach of their inclusive practices.

摘要

在学术活动中,包容性正面临越来越严格的审查,因为这些活动所服务的社区对实际能够参加的人员提出了更高的期望。近年来,为使学术活动更加多样化而做出的积极努力取得了进展并创造了动力。然而,我们必须反思这些努力,并确定哪些代表性不足的群体处于不利地位。学术活动中的包容性对于确保话语和观点的多样性、帮助建立网络以及避免学术孤岛至关重要。所有这些都有助于发展一个强大而有弹性的学术领域。我们制定这十条简单规则,既是为了放大那些一直在发声的声音,也是为了庆祝许多平等、多样性和包容性实践的进展,这些实践继续推动着学术活动的组织。这些规则旨在提高认识,并提供切实可行的建议和工具,以进一步支持这些举措。这旨在支持深度学习盛会、神经匹配学院、IBRO-Simons 计算神经科学座谈会、生物多样性信息标准(TDWG)、神经科学中的阿拉伯人、FAIRPoints 和 OLS(前身为开放生命科学)等学术组织。本文呼吁组织者重新评估其包容性实践的影响和范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/0bf1c43743fc/pcbi.1011797.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/3d360672170a/pcbi.1011797.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/99f5b59f8278/pcbi.1011797.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/b10f0e11905a/pcbi.1011797.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/55bdbaa25086/pcbi.1011797.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/0bf1c43743fc/pcbi.1011797.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/3d360672170a/pcbi.1011797.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/99f5b59f8278/pcbi.1011797.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/b10f0e11905a/pcbi.1011797.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/55bdbaa25086/pcbi.1011797.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d1/10906823/0bf1c43743fc/pcbi.1011797.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events.推动学术活动包容性边界的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 1;20(3):e1011797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011797. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.在学术环境中拥抱多样性和包容性:来自人类脑图谱组织的见解。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117742. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117742. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
3
The urgency of restructuring the landscape of behavioral medicine: Commentary from early-career diversity institute scholars.行为医学领域重构的紧迫性:早期职业多样性研究所学者的评论。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):149-155. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad068.
4
Galvanizing for the future: a bottom-up departmental approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion.为未来加油:一种自下而上的部门方法,实现多样性、公平性和包容性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):715.e1-715.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
5
COVID-19 Threatens Progress Toward Gender Equity Within Academic Medicine.COVID-19 威胁着学术医学领域内性别平等的进展。
Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):813-816. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003782.
6
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).第二届理论与产业研讨会会议录(2007年6月12日至14日,奥地利维也纳埃尔温·薛定谔研究所)
J Phys Condens Matter. 2008 Feb 13;20(6):060301. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/06/060301. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
7
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.健康公平倡导:一项综合综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12112.
8
Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Allied Health Using Ten Best Practices.利用十大最佳实践增加医疗相关领域的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)。
J Allied Health. 2023 Fall;52(3):e99-e102.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Beyond the bench: how inclusion and exclusion make us the scientists we are.超越实验室:包容与排斥如何塑造我们成为现在的科学家。
Mol Biol Cell. 2020 Sep 15;31(20):2164-2167. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-06-0374.

本文引用的文献

1
Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive.拟议的国际生物伦理学会议原则:反歧视、全球性和包容性。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):13-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2232748. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
The scientific director: A complimentary model for academic leadership.科学主任:学术领导力的补充模式。
Cell. 2023 Jul 6;186(14):2951-2955. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.036.
3
Ten simple rules to host an inclusive conference.举办包容性会议的十项简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 21;18(7):e1010164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010164. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Two-thirds of scientists want to keep alcohol at conferences.三分之二的科学家希望在会议上保留酒精饮品。
Nature. 2022 Mar 11. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00703-5.
5
The scientific workplace in 2021.2021年的科研工作环境。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7890):765-766. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03710-0.
6
Keep online option at conferences - it makes them more inclusive.在会议中保留线上参会选项——这会使会议更具包容性。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7880):257. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02752-8.
7
Neuromatch Academy: Teaching Computational Neuroscience with Global Accessibility.神经匹配学院:用全球可及性教授计算神经科学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jul;25(7):535-538. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Changing scientific meetings for the better.让科学会议变得更好。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):296-300. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01067-y.
9
Towards Democratizing and Automating Online Conferences: Lessons from the Neuromatch Conferences.迈向在线会议的民主化和自动化:来自 Neuromatch 会议的经验教训。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;25(4):265-268. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
When we increase diversity in academia, we all win.当我们增加学术界的多样性时,我们都会受益。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Dec 3;21(12):e51994. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051994. Epub 2020 Nov 20.