Danhauer J L, Brink T J
J Aud Res. 1985 Jul;25(3):143-8.
Performance-Level functions were determined for part- and full-list Edgerton and Danhauer (1979) Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) mean scores of 15 normal-hearing (NH) and 15 mild-to-moderately hearing-impaired (HI) Ss. In the first part-list procedure S received 5 different items from the 25-item NST List A at each ascending SL (25, 35, 45, 55, and 65 db re: S's better-ear SRT), while in the second, full-list, procedure S received the full 25 items. As previous studies had shown, the NST could be used to distinguish the NH and HI groups. The P-L functions were not significantly different for the part- vs the full-list procedures except at the 35 and 55 db SLs in which the part-list scores tended to overestimate those from the full list for both groups, to a maximum difference in percent correct of about 7%. Clinical implications are presented.
针对15名听力正常（NH）和15名轻度至中度听力受损（HI）受试者的部分列表和完整列表的埃杰顿和丹豪尔（1979）无意义音节测试（NST）平均得分，确定了表现水平函数。在第一个部分列表程序中，受试者在每个递增的声级（相对于受试者较好耳的听阈，分别为25、35、45、55和65分贝）下，从25项的NST列表A中接收5个不同的项目，而在第二个完整列表程序中，受试者接收完整的25个项目。如先前研究所示，NST可用于区分NH组和HI组。部分列表程序和完整列表程序的表现水平函数除在35分贝和55分贝声级外无显著差异，在这两个声级下，部分列表得分在两组中均倾向于高估完整列表的得分，正确百分比的最大差异约为7%。文中还阐述了临床意义。
