Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Nov 8;50(6):1371-1381. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae021.
To provide precision cognitive remediation therapy (CR) for schizophrenia, we need to understand whether the mechanism for improved functioning is via cognition improvements. This mechanism has not been rigorously tested for potential moderator effects.
We used data (n = 377) from a randomized controlled trial using CIRCuiTS, a therapist-supported CR, with participants from first-episode psychosis services. We applied structured equation modeling to test whether: (1) CR hours explain the goal attainment functional outcome (GAS) at posttreatment, (2) global cognitive improvement mediates GAS, and if (3) total symptoms moderate the CR hours to cognitive improvement pathway, and/or negative symptoms moderate the cognition to functioning pathway, testing moderator effects via the mediator or directly on CR hours to functioning path.
CR produced significant functioning benefit for each therapy hour (Coeff = 0.203, 95% CI 0.101-0.304, P < .001). The mediated path from CR hours to cognition and cognition to functioning was small and nonsignificant (Coeff = 0.014, 95% CI = -0.010, 0.037, P = .256). Total symptoms did not moderate the path to cognition (P = .211) or the direct path to outcome (P = .896). However, negative symptoms significantly moderated the effect of cognitive improvements on functioning (P = .015) with high negative symptoms reducing the functional gains of improved cognition.
Although cognitive improvements were correlated with functioning benefit, they did not fully explain the positive effect of increased therapy hours on functioning, suggesting additional CR factors also contribute to therapy benefit. Negative symptoms interfere with the translation of cognitive improvements into functional gains so need consideration.
为了为精神分裂症提供精准认知矫正治疗(CR),我们需要了解改善功能的机制是否通过认知改善。对于潜在的调节效应,这种机制尚未经过严格测试。
我们使用了一项随机对照试验(n = 377)的数据,该试验使用了 CIRCuiTS,这是一种由治疗师支持的 CR,参与者来自首发精神病服务。我们应用结构方程模型来检验以下内容:(1)CR 小时数能否解释治疗后目标实现功能结果(GAS),(2)整体认知改善是否介导 GAS,以及(3)总症状是否调节 CR 小时数与认知改善的关系,以及/或者负性症状是否调节认知与功能的关系,通过中介或直接对 CR 小时数与功能的关系来检验调节效应。
CR 为每个治疗小时产生了显著的功能效益(Coeff = 0.203,95% CI 0.101-0.304,P < 0.001)。从 CR 小时数到认知和认知到功能的中介路径较小且不显著(Coeff = 0.014,95% CI 0.010-0.037,P = 0.256)。总症状并未调节认知的路径(P = 0.211)或对结果的直接路径(P = 0.896)。然而,负性症状显著调节了认知改善对功能的影响(P = 0.015),即高负性症状降低了认知改善的功能增益。
尽管认知改善与功能效益相关,但它们并未完全解释治疗时间增加对功能的积极影响,这表明其他 CR 因素也有助于治疗效益。负性症状会干扰认知改善转化为功能增益,因此需要考虑。