ARDEC Academy, Rimini, 47923, Italy.
Private Practice, Cartagena de Indias, 130001, Colombia.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;28(3):1139-1149. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01228-z. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
To avoid cortical compression, several implant systems have included in the protocol dedicated drills aimed at widening the cortical region of osteotomy. However, the manual execution of this operation does not guarantee the necessary precision. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the optimal size of the recipient site at the level of the alveolar crest in relation to the size of the coronal region of the implant to achieve the best healing result.
Blades of different diameters were incorporated into the coronal part of the implant to prepare the cortical region of the mandibular alveolar bone crest in different dimensions in relation to the collar of the implant. The differences in diameter of the blades in relation to the collar of the implant were as follows: one control group, -175 μm, and three test groups, 0 μm, + 50 μm, or + 200 μm.
The marginal bone loss (MBL) at the buccal aspect was 0.7 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.7 mm in the - 175 μm, 0.0 μm, + 50 μm, + 200 μm groups, respectively. The differences were statistically significant between group + 50 μm and control group - 175 μm (p = 0.019), and between + 50 μm and + 200 μm (p < 0.01) groups. The level of osseointegration at the buccal aspect was more coronally located in the test groups than in the control group, whereas the bone-to-implant contact percentage was higher in the + 50 μm and + 200 μm groups. However, these differences were not statistically significant.
The lowest bone crest resorption and highest levels of osseointegration were observed in the 0.0 μm and + 50 μm groups. The cortical region where the blades had performed their cutting action showed regular healing with perfect hard and soft tissues sealing in all the groups. Cortical blades gathered bone particles, particularly in the + 200 μm group, which were incorporated into the newly formed bone. The results from the present experiment provide support to the use of blades that produce a marginal gap of 50 μm after implant insertion.
为避免皮质骨压缩,一些种植体系统在方案中包含了专门的钻头,旨在扩大骨切开的皮质区域。然而,手动执行此操作并不能保证必要的精度。因此,本研究旨在确定牙槽嵴水平的受植区的最佳尺寸与种植体冠状区域的尺寸的关系,以达到最佳的愈合效果。
将不同直径的刀片纳入种植体的冠状部分,以在与种植体领圈相关的不同尺寸下制备下颌牙槽嵴的皮质区域。刀片相对于种植体领圈的直径差异如下:一个对照组,-175μm;和三个实验组,0μm、+50μm 或+200μm。
颊侧边缘骨吸收(MBL)分别为-175μm、0.0μm、+50μm 和+200μm 组的 0.7mm、0.5mm、0.2mm 和 0.7mm。组+50μm 和对照组-175μm(p=0.019)之间以及+50μm 和+200μm(p<0.01)之间的差异具有统计学意义。在颊侧,实验组的骨整合水平比对照组更冠方,而+50μm 和+200μm 组的骨-种植体接触百分比更高。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。
在 0.0μm 和+50μm 组中观察到最低的骨嵴吸收和最高的骨整合水平。刀片进行切割操作的皮质区域显示出规则的愈合,所有组均具有完美的硬组织和软组织密封。皮质刀片收集了骨颗粒,特别是在+200μm 组中,这些颗粒被纳入新形成的骨中。本实验的结果支持使用插入种植体后产生 50μm 边缘间隙的刀片。