Department of Biotechnology, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107, Murcia, Spain.
Department of Research, Biotecnos - Technology and Science, Cuareim 1483, 11100, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04313-5.
The aim of the present in vivo study was to analyze and compare the effects on the crestal bone healing of two different implant macrogeometries installed in fresh socket areas and in normal bone areas with different insertion torque values. Two implant macrogeometries were used in the present study, DuoCone implant (DC) and Maestro implant (MAE), forming four groups: group DCws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group DCfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets); group MAEws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group MAEfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets). After 30 and 90 days of implantations in the bilateral mandibles of 10 sheep, eighty implants were evaluated through digital X-ray images and histologic slices. The crestal bone position in relation to the implant platform shoulder was measured and compared. The measured insertion torque was 47.2 ± 4.69 Ncm for the DCws group, 43.4 ± 4.87 Ncm for the DCfs group, 29.3 ± 3.16 Ncm for the MAEws group, and 27.7 ± 4.41 Ncm for the MAEfs group. The radiographic mesio-distal and histological bucco-lingual analyses showed significantly greater vertical bone loss in the implants installed with high torque (DC groups) in comparison to the implants installed with a low torque (MAE groups) (p < 0.05), at both evaluation times. In general, low insertion torque values (Maestro implants) showed better results of MBL when compared to implants installed with higher torque values (Duo Cone implants). Moreover, our results showed that the implants installed in the sites without sockets showed a less MBL in comparison with the implants installed in sites of fresh sockets.
本体内研究旨在分析和比较两种不同种植体宏观结构在不同植入扭矩值下植入新鲜牙槽窝区和正常骨区对牙槽嵴骨愈合的影响。本研究使用了两种种植体宏观结构,DuoCone 种植体(DC)和 Maestro 种植体(MAE),形成了四个组:组 DCws,其中种植体植入愈合骨(无牙槽窝);组 DCfs,其中种植体植入拔牙窝区(新鲜牙槽窝);组 MAEws,其中种植体植入愈合骨(无牙槽窝);组 MAEfs,其中种植体植入拔牙窝区(新鲜牙槽窝)。在 10 只绵羊双侧下颌骨中分别植入 30 天和 90 天后,通过数字 X 射线图像和组织切片评估了 80 个种植体。测量并比较了种植体平台肩与牙槽嵴骨位置的关系。测量的植入扭矩分别为 DCws 组 47.2±4.69 Ncm、DCfs 组 43.4±4.87 Ncm、MAEws 组 29.3±3.16 Ncm 和 MAEfs 组 27.7±4.41 Ncm。放射学的近远中分析和组织学的颊舌分析显示,在两个评估时间点,高扭矩(DC 组)植入的种植体与低扭矩(MAE 组)植入的种植体相比,牙槽嵴骨垂直吸收量显著增加(p<0.05)。总体而言,与植入高扭矩值(DuoCone 种植体)的种植体相比,低植入扭矩值(Maestro 种植体)的 MBL 结果更好。此外,我们的结果表明,与植入新鲜牙槽窝的种植体相比,植入无牙槽窝的种植体的 MBL 更少。