Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Jan;110(1):157-175. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34899. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
The aim of the present systematic review was to analyse studies using inorganic implant coatings and, in a meta-analysis, the effect of specifically tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) implant surface coatings on bone formation according to the PRISMA criteria. Inclusion criteria were the comparison to rough surfaced titanium implants in large animal studies at different time points of healing. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Fifteen of these analyzed the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) around the most investigated inorganic titanium implant coatings, namely TCP and HA, and were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the TCP group show after 14 days a BIC being 3.48% points lower compared with the reference surface. This difference in BIC decreases to 0.85% points after 21-28 days. After 42-84 days, the difference in BIC of 13.79% points is in favor of the TCP-coatings. However, the results are not statistically significant, in part due to the fact that the variability between the studies increased over time. The results of the HA group show a significant difference in mean BIC of 6.94% points after 14 days in favor of the reference surface. After 21-28 days and 42-84 days the difference in BIC is slightly in favor of the test group with 1.53% points and 1.57% points, respectively, lacking significance. In large animals, there does not seem to be much effect of TCP-coated or HA-coated implants over uncoated rough titanium implants in the short term.
本系统评价的目的是分析使用无机种植体涂层的研究,并根据 PRISMA 标准在荟萃分析中分析特定的磷酸三钙 (TCP) 和羟基磷灰石 (HA) 种植体表面涂层对骨形成的影响。纳入标准是将在不同愈合时间点的大型动物研究中与粗糙表面钛种植体进行比较。有 40 项研究符合系统评价的纳入标准。其中 15 项分析了最受关注的无机钛种植体涂层(即 TCP 和 HA)周围的骨与种植体接触 (BIC),并被纳入荟萃分析。TCP 组的结果显示,在第 14 天,BIC 比参考表面低 3.48%。这种 BIC 差异在第 21-28 天减少到 0.85%。在第 42-84 天,BIC 差异为 13.79%,有利于 TCP 涂层。然而,结果没有统计学意义,部分原因是随着时间的推移,研究之间的变异性增加。HA 组的结果显示,在第 14 天,BIC 的平均差异为 6.94%,有利于参考表面。在第 21-28 天和第 42-84 天,BIC 的差异分别有利于试验组 1.53%和 1.57%,但没有统计学意义。在大型动物中,在短期内,TCP 涂层或 HA 涂层种植体似乎并没有比未涂层的粗糙钛种植体有更大的效果。