Hunter S M, Parker F C, Williamson G D, Downey A M, Webber L S, Berenson G S
J Human Stress. 1985 Winter;11(4):177-83. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1985.9936756.
The purpose of this study was to contribute to concept clarification regarding identification of the Type A behavior pattern in children. To accomplish this, two measurement techniques for assessing Type A behavior in children (MYTH and Hunter-Wolf) were compared to a third (a teacher-rated measure of hyperactivity: the Conners), since this latter measure, although often used to diagnose hyperactive children, seemed also to measure some Type A-like behaviors. The Hunter-Wolf also included a self-assessment of Type A behavior. The conceptual and measurement issue was: Are teachers rating Type A or hyperactive/problem behaviors in children? Fifty-five teachers participated. They rated 253 students, aged 8 to 17 years, in a biracial community. The clear overlap between teacher-assessed Type A and the Conners hyperactivity measure was demonstrated when the best predictor of teacher-assessed Type A measure was the Conners. This was especially true for black males and white females. Little relationship existed between teacher-assessed Type A and self-assessment. The conclusions suggest that implications drawn from teacher-assessed Type A behavior in children may be inadequate because of potential ethnic and gender artifactual measurement error.
本研究的目的是为澄清儿童A型行为模式的识别概念做出贡献。为实现这一目标,将两种评估儿童A型行为的测量技术(MYTH和亨特-沃尔夫)与第三种技术(一种教师评定的多动测量方法:康纳斯量表)进行比较,因为后一种测量方法虽然常用于诊断多动儿童,但似乎也能测量一些类似A型的行为。亨特-沃尔夫量表还包括对A型行为的自我评估。概念和测量问题是:教师评定的是儿童的A型行为还是多动/问题行为?55名教师参与了研究。他们对一个双种族社区中253名年龄在8至17岁的学生进行了评定。当教师评定的A型行为测量的最佳预测指标是康纳斯量表时,证明了教师评定的A型行为与康纳斯多动测量之间存在明显重叠。对于黑人男性和白人女性来说尤其如此。教师评定的A型行为与自我评估之间几乎没有关系。研究结论表明,由于潜在的种族和性别人为测量误差,从教师评定的儿童A型行为中得出的结论可能并不充分。