Comparative study of tumorfree laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of earlystage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer has the advantages of little blood loss and rapid recovery, but its therapeutic effect is still controversial. This study aims to analyze the surgical procedure and clinical efficacy of tumor-free laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer, and to explore the indications of laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective study. The data of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer admitted to Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from July 2019 to December 2021 were collected. According to 2018 the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical staging, all patients were in IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 stage. Among them, 45 patients underwent tumor-free laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator (laparoscopy group) and 16 patients underwent open surgery (open surgery group). Patients were followed up for 12-41 months. The differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, bleeding volume, extent of surgical resection, surgical complications, and prognosis were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to the open surgery group, the laparoscopy group had significantly shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss (both <0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of the length of excised uterosacral ligaments, cardinal ligaments, vagina, and the number of excised lymph nodes (all >0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (>0.05). No death or recurrence occurred in the 2 groups during the follow-up period. The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were both 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

For early-stage cervical cancer with a diameter ≤2 cm, tumor-free laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is safe and feasible, and the short-term outcomes is no less than that of open surgery.