• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于手术方式和子宫操纵器对宫颈癌预后影响的回顾性研究。

A retrospective study on the effect of surgical approaches and uterine manipulators on the prognosis of cervical cancer.

作者信息

Guo Xinmeng, Song Jiangnan, Tian Shuang, Li Weiping, Zhang Jinning, Yao Yuanqing

机构信息

School of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Tianjin, 300071, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):3047-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07746-1. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07746-1
PMID:39477834
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy. However, the optimal surgical approach and benefits of uterine manipulator use remain unclear in this context. This study aimed to compare patient outcomes among different surgical approaches including laparoscopic, combined vaginal and laparoscopic, abdominal, and robotic using the da Vinci surgical system. Moreover, we also aimed to examine the impact of uterine manipulator use in radical hysterectomy on the outcomes of patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included data from 848 patients with cervical cancer stage IA2-IIA2 that underwent a radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2009 and 2019. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics, including body mass index, age, FIGO stage, pathological type, and tumor differentiation status and size, were comparable. Five-year survival rates were comparable among the groups that underwent different types of surgery regardless of disease stage. Five-year survival rates were comparable between the groups that underwent surgery with and without the use of a uterine manipulator.

CONCLUSIONS

All surgical approaches examined in this study had comparable efficacy and safety profiles. The use of uterine manipulators during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer does not increase the risk of death.

摘要

目的

宫颈癌是一种常见的妇科恶性肿瘤。然而,在这种情况下,最佳手术方式以及使用子宫操纵器的益处仍不明确。本研究旨在比较不同手术方式(包括腹腔镜手术、经阴道与腹腔镜联合手术、开腹手术以及使用达芬奇手术系统的机器人手术)的患者结局。此外,我们还旨在研究在宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术中使用子宫操纵器对患者结局的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2009年至2019年期间在中国人民解放军总医院接受根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术的848例IA2-IIA2期宫颈癌患者的数据。对患者的人口统计学和临床特征、围手术期发现以及术后结局进行了检查。

结果

患者特征,包括体重指数、年龄、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期、病理类型、肿瘤分化状态和大小,具有可比性。无论疾病分期如何,接受不同类型手术的组间五年生存率具有可比性。在使用和未使用子宫操纵器进行手术的组间,五年生存率具有可比性。

结论

本研究中检查的所有手术方式具有相当的疗效和安全性。在宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术中使用子宫操纵器不会增加死亡风险。

相似文献

1
A retrospective study on the effect of surgical approaches and uterine manipulators on the prognosis of cervical cancer.一项关于手术方式和子宫操纵器对宫颈癌预后影响的回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):3047-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07746-1. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.微型腹腔镜与机器人根治性子宫切除术加系统盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌患者:多中心研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.048. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
4
[Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].[局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受腹腔镜手术或开腹手术预后的比较分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):609-616. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200727-00612.
5
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
6
A retrospective study of the effects of uterine manipulators on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.回顾性研究子宫操作器对宫颈癌患者预后的影响。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241233966. doi: 10.1177/03000605241233966.
7
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by pulling the round ligament without a uterine manipulator.腹腔镜下不使用子宫操纵器经圆韧带提拉法宫颈癌根治术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.045. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.腹腔镜下无子宫操作器械的神经保护广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌 IB 期:技术描述、LACC 试验时代后的经验和结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):1039-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05835-5. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.宫颈癌患者使用三臂机器人与传统多端口腹腔镜进行机器人根治性子宫切除术的手术结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1222-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1222.
10
Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.宫颈癌根治性经阴道子宫切除术联合腹膜外盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001;22(1):31-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of tumorfree laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of earlystage cervical cancer.无瘤腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗早期宫颈癌的对比研究
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Nov 28;48(11):1686-1695. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230334.
2
Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).对于肿瘤直径≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者,微创根治性手术安全吗?(MISAFE):妇科肿瘤研究人员合作协作研究(GORILLA-1003)。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep;176:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
Survival after laparoscopic radical surgery for stage IA-IIB cervical cancer: 1316 consecutive cases from a national laparoscopic training center in China.
IA-IIB期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治术后的生存情况:来自中国一家国家级腹腔镜培训中心的1316例连续病例。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan;28(1):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02262-1. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.微创外科与剖腹手术治疗宫颈癌的术中及术后并发症和伤口感染的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13962. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
Metastatic extent-specific prognosis of women with stage IVB cervical cancer: multiple versus single distant organ involvement.IVB 期宫颈癌转移范围特异性预后:多处与单一远处器官转移。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;307(2):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06611-3. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Potential prognostic factors in progression-free survival for patients with cervical cancer.宫颈癌无进展生存的潜在预后因素。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 10;21(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08243-3.
7
Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.手术入路和子宫操纵器的使用与早期宫颈癌手术中的 LVSI 无关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1573-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
8
Trends and survival outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for stage II uterine cancer.II期子宫癌机器人手术、腹腔镜手术及开放手术的趋势与生存结局
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1347-1355. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001646. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.早期宫颈癌患者行腹式或腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的生存情况:全国性队列研究及文献复习。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Feb 15.