Maguire Edward R, Telep Cody W, Abt Thomas, Adams Ericka
School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Arizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 3;20(2):e1388. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1388. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: This systematic review will synthesize the available evaluation research on the effectiveness of street outreach conflict mediation programs. The review seeks to answer the following primary question: Are street outreach worker strategies that use conflict mediation and/or violence interruption strategies effective at reducing violence? Assuming a sufficient number of eligible studies, this review will also address two additional questions: Are there certain program elements that render these strategies more or less effective? Are there certain conditions under which these strategies are more or less effective? As policymakers struggle to understand the policy options available to them for preventing and reducing violence, having clear answers to these three questions will help them make more informed decisions. The primary focus of this review is the effect of these strategies on violence. Nonetheless, when data are available we will collect information on secondary outcomes such as the cost-effectiveness of these strategies and their impacts on perceptual or attitudinal measures such as fear, perceived safety, and violence-related norms.
这是一项Cochrane系统评价(干预措施)的方案。目标如下:本系统评价将综合关于街头外展冲突调解项目有效性的现有评估研究。该评价旨在回答以下主要问题:运用冲突调解和/或暴力干预策略的街头外展工作者策略在减少暴力方面是否有效?假设存在足够数量的合格研究,本评价还将探讨另外两个问题:是否存在某些项目要素会使这些策略的效果更强或更弱?是否存在某些条件会使这些策略的效果更强或更弱?由于政策制定者在努力理解他们可用于预防和减少暴力的政策选项,明确回答这三个问题将有助于他们做出更明智的决策。本评价的主要重点是这些策略对暴力的影响。尽管如此,如有数据,我们将收集关于次要结果的信息,如这些策略的成本效益以及它们对诸如恐惧、感知安全和与暴力相关规范等感知或态度指标的影响。