Suppr超能文献

方案:减少暴力的街头外展冲突调解项目。

PROTOCOL: Street outreach conflict mediation programs for reducing violence.

作者信息

Maguire Edward R, Telep Cody W, Abt Thomas, Adams Ericka

机构信息

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Arizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.

Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 3;20(2):e1388. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1388. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: This systematic review will synthesize the available evaluation research on the effectiveness of street outreach conflict mediation programs. The review seeks to answer the following primary question: Are street outreach worker strategies that use conflict mediation and/or violence interruption strategies effective at reducing violence? Assuming a sufficient number of eligible studies, this review will also address two additional questions: Are there certain program elements that render these strategies more or less effective? Are there certain conditions under which these strategies are more or less effective? As policymakers struggle to understand the policy options available to them for preventing and reducing violence, having clear answers to these three questions will help them make more informed decisions. The primary focus of this review is the effect of these strategies on violence. Nonetheless, when data are available we will collect information on secondary outcomes such as the cost-effectiveness of these strategies and their impacts on perceptual or attitudinal measures such as fear, perceived safety, and violence-related norms.

摘要

这是一项Cochrane系统评价(干预措施)的方案。目标如下:本系统评价将综合关于街头外展冲突调解项目有效性的现有评估研究。该评价旨在回答以下主要问题:运用冲突调解和/或暴力干预策略的街头外展工作者策略在减少暴力方面是否有效?假设存在足够数量的合格研究,本评价还将探讨另外两个问题:是否存在某些项目要素会使这些策略的效果更强或更弱?是否存在某些条件会使这些策略的效果更强或更弱?由于政策制定者在努力理解他们可用于预防和减少暴力的政策选项,明确回答这三个问题将有助于他们做出更明智的决策。本评价的主要重点是这些策略对暴力的影响。尽管如此,如有数据,我们将收集关于次要结果的信息,如这些策略的成本效益以及它们对诸如恐惧、感知安全和与暴力相关规范等感知或态度指标的影响。

相似文献

1
PROTOCOL: Street outreach conflict mediation programs for reducing violence.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 3;20(2):e1388. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1388. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 28;18(1):e1217. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1217. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol: Factors contributing to the discontinuation of breastfeeding upon women's return to work: A systematic review protocol.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 9;20(3):e1434. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1434. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Body-worn cameras' effects on police officers and citizen behavior: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 9;16(3):e1112. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1112. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Meta-analysis of prevalence: I statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity.
Res Synth Methods. 2022 May;13(3):363-367. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1547. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Meta-analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models.
Prev Sci. 2022 Apr;23(3):425-438. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01246-3. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Using synthetic control methodology to estimate effects of a intervention in Baltimore, Maryland.
Inj Prev. 2022 Feb;28(1):61-67. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044056. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Modeling Contagion Through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245.
9
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):55-79. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1164. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
10
Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates.
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jan;1(1):39-65. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.5. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验