Dutta Shilpa, More Akash, Shrivastava Deepti, Choudhary Namrata, Wanjari Mayur, Anjankar Vaibhav P, Anjankar Ashish, Chopra Mehak, Khemani Shivani
Clinical Embryology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53418. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Objective This study aimed to comprehensively examine the correlation between success trends in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy and the advancing age of patients undergoing fertility interventions. Methods Female participants were categorized randomly into five age groups undergoing PRP or conventional hormone replacement therapy. Procedures included controlled ovarian stimulation, escalating estrogen dosage, gonadotrophin injections, and embryo transfer post-ovulation trigger. A pivotal PRP intervention was provided to half of the age sub-groups, and endometrial thickness was assessed 24 hours prior to embryo transfer. Statistical analysis employed SPSS 26.0 for Windows Student Version (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), incorporating descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test to explore age-PRP success relationships (p<0.05). Results The study, involving 60 participants, revealed a balanced patient distribution across age groups, with 20-30 age groups contributing 23.33% each. Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between PRP and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) groups. Post-intervention, PRP demonstrated consistently higher endometrial thickness (p<0.001) and clinical pregnancy rates (63.33%) compared to HRT (40%). These findings suggest a positive association between PRP therapy and improved outcomes, particularly in younger age cohorts. Conclusion The study challenges traditional perspectives on hormonal influences in fertility, highlighting a potential link between PRP therapy and favorable outcomes among younger age groups. Improved endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rates in the PRP group emphasize the need for further exploration of PRP's mechanisms and applications in reproductive medicine.
目的 本研究旨在全面探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗成功率趋势与接受生育干预患者年龄增长之间的相关性。方法 将女性参与者随机分为五个年龄组,分别接受PRP治疗或传统激素替代疗法。程序包括控制性卵巢刺激、递增雌激素剂量、注射促性腺激素以及排卵触发后进行胚胎移植。对一半年龄亚组进行关键的PRP干预,并在胚胎移植前24小时评估子宫内膜厚度。使用适用于Windows系统的SPSS 26.0学生版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计分析,包括描述性统计、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、图基真实显著性差异(HSD)检验,以探讨年龄与PRP治疗成功率之间的关系(p<0.05)。结果 该研究共纳入60名参与者,各年龄组患者分布均衡,20 - 30岁年龄组各占23.33%。基线特征显示PRP组与激素替代疗法(HRT)组之间无显著差异。干预后,与HRT组(40%)相比,PRP组的子宫内膜厚度持续更高(p<0.001),临床妊娠率为63.33%。这些发现表明PRP治疗与改善的结局之间存在正相关,尤其是在较年轻的年龄组中。结论 该研究挑战了关于生育中激素影响的传统观点,突出了PRP治疗与较年轻年龄组良好结局之间的潜在联系。PRP组子宫内膜厚度和临床妊娠率的提高强调了进一步探索PRP在生殖医学中的作用机制和应用的必要性。