Does central venous stenosis affects the brachial artery flow volume and peripheral vascular resistive index in patients on maintenance hemodialysis? A retrospective study.
作者信息
Foula Hassan Saied, Itakura Masayuki, Miwa Naofumi, Momohara Keisuke, Sakurai Hiroshi, Onogi Takeshi, Okubo Kentarou, Foula Mohamed, Elrggal Mohamed, Magdy Mennah, Tsuboi Masato, Sato Takashi
机构信息
Nephrology Division, Kidney and Urology Center, Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt.
Kaikoukai Vascular Access Treatment Center, Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, Japan.
出版信息
J Vasc Access. 2025 Mar;26(2):622-627. doi: 10.1177/11297298231226427. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
BACKGROUND
A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is crucial for the patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Central venous stenosis (CVS) is a common, yet, overlooked complication of VA as its diagnosis is challenging. Moreover, its effect on the flow volume (FV) and the peripheral resistive index (RI) was not well discussed before. Despite the availability of doppler ultrasound (DUS) in most centers, direct visualization of central veins using DUS is quite difficult.
METHODS
This is a retrospective single-center self-controlled cohort study that was conducted in a specialized vascular access management tertiary center in Japan and included all patients with CVS who underwent percutaneous transluminal angiography (PTA) with or without vascular stenting in the period from January 2014 to September 2022. The patients were divided according to their VA type into arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and arteriovenous graft (AVG) groups, then subdivided, according to the type of stenosis, into two subgroups: CVS, and mixed central and peripheral venous stenosis (MVS) groups. The FV and RI of the feeding artery were compared in the same procedure before and after PTA to assess the impact of the procedure itself.
RESULTS
Data of 485 percutaneous transluminal angiography procedures (PTA), performed in 95 patients during the period from January 2014 to September 2022, were collected. FV and RI were significantly affected in the patients with MVS than patients with CVS. After PTA, both FV and RI were significantly improved. The improvement rate of FV and RI after PTA were significantly higher in patients with MVS than patients with CVS. However, it was difficult to determine the cut-off value to diagnose or to assess the improvement of CVS.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that FV and RI measurement by DUS are good tools, along with the clinical findings for assessment of CVS in certain situations.
Zotero 插件