Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Departments of Nuclear Medicine.
Ultrasound Q. 2024 Mar 1;40(1):66-73. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000673.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS). From January 2015 to May 2019, a total of 912 breast lesions in 725 consecutive patients were included in this study. κ statistics were calculated to identify interobserver agreement of ABVS and HHUS. The diagnostic performance for ABVS and HHUS was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval, sensitivity, and specificity. The sensitivities of ABVS and HHUS were 95.95% and 93.69%, and the specificities were 85.47% and 81.20%, respectively. A difference that nearly reached statistical significance was observed in sensitivities between ABVS and HHUS (P = 0.0525). The specificity of ABVS was significantly higher than that of HHUS (P = 0.006). When lesions were classified according to their maximum diameter, the sensitivity and specificity of ABVS were significantly higher than HHUS for lesions ≤20 mm, while they made no statistical significance between ABVS and HHUS for lesions >20 mm. The interobserver agreement for ABVS was better than that of HHUS. Automated breast volume scanner was more valuable than HHUS in diagnosing breast cancer, especially for lesions ≤20 mm, and it could be a valuable diagnostic tool for breast cancer.
本研究旨在评估自动乳腺容积扫描仪(ABVS)与手持超声(HHUS)相比的临床价值。2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月,共有 725 例连续患者的 912 个乳腺病变纳入本研究。采用 κ 统计量评估 ABVS 和 HHUS 的观察者间一致性。ABVS 和 HHUS 的诊断性能用受试者工作特征曲线下面积以及相应的 95%置信区间、敏感性和特异性表示。ABVS 和 HHUS 的敏感性分别为 95.95%和 93.69%,特异性分别为 85.47%和 81.20%。ABVS 和 HHUS 的敏感性差异接近统计学意义(P=0.0525)。ABVS 的特异性显著高于 HHUS(P=0.006)。根据病变最大直径对病变进行分类时,ABVS 的敏感性和特异性在≤20mm 的病变中显著高于 HHUS,而在>20mm 的病变中,ABVS 和 HHUS 之间无统计学意义。ABVS 的观察者间一致性优于 HHUS。ABVS 诊断乳腺癌的价值优于 HHUS,尤其是对于≤20mm 的病变,可作为乳腺癌有价值的诊断工具。