Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Int J Phytoremediation. 2024;26(9):1379-1382. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2024.2322631. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
Toxic metals and metalloids, especially from anthropogenic sources, now pollute substantial areas of our planet. Phytoextraction is a proven technology with the potential to reduce metal/metalloid pollution, and where financially viable, recover valuable metals ('phytomining'). Toward these aims, there has been a surge of publications over the last two decades. While important progress is being made, ongoing propagation of poor practice, and the resultant drain from funding sources, is hindering this promising research area. This includes mis-ascribing hyperaccumulator species, hydroponics with extremely high dose levels, misuse of Bioconcentration Factors, use of food or biomass crops with low accumulation for phytoextraction, the phenomenon of 'template papers' in which a known hyperaccumulator for element is dosed with element , or a common weed species dosed with any variety of elements to make it 'hyperaccumulate'. Here we highlight these misconceptions with the hope that this will help to: (i) disseminate accurate definitions for metal accumulation; (ii) quash the propagation of poor practice by limiting the inflation of unnecessary publications the practice of 'template paper' writing; (iii) be used by journal editors and reviewers to validate their reasoning to authors; and (iv) contribute to faster progress in delivering this technology to in-the-field practitioners.
有毒金属和类金属,尤其是人为来源的有毒金属和类金属,如今已经污染了我们星球的大片区域。植物提取技术已经被证实可以减少金属/类金属污染,并且在经济可行的情况下,还可以回收有价值的金属(“植物采矿”)。因此,在过去的二十年中,相关出版物如雨后春笋般涌现。虽然正在取得重要进展,但不良实践的持续传播,以及由此导致的资金来源枯竭,正在阻碍这一充满前景的研究领域的发展。这包括错误地将超积累物种归因于某种元素,在水培实验中使用极高剂量水平,错误使用生物浓缩系数,使用生物量或粮食作物进行植物提取,以及“模板论文”现象,即已知的某种元素超积累物种被施以另一种元素,或者常见的杂草物种被施以任何种类的元素使其“超积累”。在这里,我们强调了这些误解,希望这有助于:(i)传播金属积累的准确定义;(ii)通过限制不必要的出版物数量来阻止不良实践的传播,避免“模板论文”的撰写;(iii)被期刊编辑和审稿人用于验证他们对作者的推理;以及(iv)有助于将这项技术更快地推向实地实践者。