Fox Miglena N, Dickson Jon M, Burch Patrick, Hind Daniel, Hawksworth Olivia
Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Medicine Optimisation Team, South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board, SY ICB, Sheffield, UK.
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0041. Print 2024 Jul.
Relational continuity of care (patients seeing the same GP) is associated with better outcomes for patients, but it has been declining in general practice in the UK.
To understand what interventions have been tried to improve relational continuity of care in general practice in the UK.
DESIGN & SETTING: Scoping review of articles on UK General Practice and written in English.
An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 2002 to the present day was undertaken. Sources of grey literature were also searched. Studies that detailed service-level methods of achieving relational continuity of care with a GP in the UK were eligible for inclusion. Interventions were described narratively in relation to the elements listed in the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). A logic model describing the rationale behind interventions was constructed.
Seventeen unique interventions were identified. The interventions used a wide variety of strategies to try to improve relational continuity. This included personal lists, amended booking processes, regular reviews, digital technology, facilitated follow-ups, altered appointment times, and use of acute hubs. Twelve of the interventions targeted specific patient groups for increased continuity while others focused on increasing continuity for all patients. Changes in continuity levels were measured inconsistently using several different methods.
Several different strategies have been used in UK general practices in an attempt to improve relational continuity of care. While there is a similar underlying logic to these interventions, their scope, aims, and methods vary considerably. Furthermore, owing to a weak evidence base, comparing their efficacy remains challenging.
连续性医疗关系(患者就诊于同一位全科医生)与患者更好的治疗效果相关,但在英国的全科医疗中,这种连续性医疗关系一直在下降。
了解在英国的全科医疗中,为改善连续性医疗关系尝试了哪些干预措施。
对关于英国全科医疗且用英文撰写的文章进行范围综述。
对2002年至今的MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus进行电子检索。还检索了灰色文献来源。详细描述在英国实现与全科医生连续性医疗关系的服务层面方法的研究符合纳入标准。根据干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)中列出的要素,对干预措施进行叙述性描述。构建了一个描述干预背后原理的逻辑模型。
确定了17种独特的干预措施。这些干预措施采用了各种各样的策略来试图改善连续性医疗关系。这包括个人名单、修订预约流程、定期评估、数字技术、便利的随访、更改预约时间以及使用急性病中心。其中12种干预措施针对特定患者群体以提高连续性,而其他措施则侧重于提高所有患者的连续性。使用几种不同方法对连续性水平变化的测量并不一致。
英国的全科医疗中采用了几种不同的策略来试图改善连续性医疗关系。虽然这些干预措施有相似的潜在逻辑,但其范围、目标和方法差异很大。此外,由于证据基础薄弱,比较它们的疗效仍然具有挑战性。