Groot Lex Jozef Johannes, Janssen Esther, Westerman Marjan, Schers Henk, Burgers Jako S, Smalbrugge Martin, Uijen Annemarie A, van der Horst Henriëtte, Maarsingh Otto R
Amsterdam University Medical Centres, General Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Radboudumc Afdeling Neurologie, Neurology, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Sep 20;75(750):e12-9. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0099.
Personal continuity is an important dimension of continuity of care in general practice and is associated with many benefits including a higher quality of GP care and lower mortality rate. Over time, changes in society and healthcare have challenged the provision of personal continuity. Especially older patients experience more negative consequences from receiving discontinuous care. To explore perspectives of general practitioners (GPs), older patients, practice nurses, and assistants on improving personal continuity in general practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that affect this improvement process. A Qualitative study using focus groups was conducted from May to August 2019. We organised four focus groups: two with GPs (n=17), one with patients (n=7), and one with practice assistants (n=4) and nurses (n=2). Focus groups were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Personal continuity was viewed as being provided by the entire general practice team and not just by the own GP. To improve personal continuity, it was suggested to invest in team communication and stability (e.g., by efficient use of the EHR) and retaining availability and accessibility of the own GP (e.g., by delegating tasks). Barriers and facilitators were perceived on individual (e.g., GPs' involvement in tasks), organisation (e.g., staff shortages) and societal level (e.g., payment system). As general practice moves towards a more team-based approach to ensure personal continuity, efforts to improve personal continuity should focus on supporting team-based provision of continuous care.
在全科医疗中,个人连续性是连续性照护的一个重要维度,它带来诸多益处,包括更高质量的全科医生照护和更低的死亡率。随着时间推移,社会和医疗保健领域的变化对个人连续性的提供构成了挑战。尤其是老年患者,接受间断性照护会产生更多负面后果。为了探究全科医生、老年患者、执业护士和助理对于改善全科医疗中个人连续性的看法,并识别影响这一改善过程的障碍和促进因素。2019年5月至8月进行了一项采用焦点小组的定性研究。我们组织了四个焦点小组:两个由全科医生组成(n = 17),一个由患者组成(n = 7),一个由执业助理(n = 4)和护士(n = 2)组成。焦点小组采用反思性主题分析法进行分析。个人连续性被视为由整个全科医疗团队提供,而不仅仅是由自己的全科医生提供。为了改善个人连续性,建议在团队沟通和稳定性方面进行投入(例如,通过高效使用电子健康记录),并保持自己的全科医生的可及性(例如,通过任务委派)。在个人层面(例如,全科医生参与任务)、组织层面(例如,人员短缺)和社会层面(例如,支付系统)都察觉到了障碍和促进因素。随着全科医疗朝着更基于团队的方式发展以确保个人连续性,改善个人连续性的努力应侧重于支持基于团队的连续性照护提供。