Groot Lex Jj, Janssen Esther, Westerman Marjan J, Schers Henk J, Burgers Jako S, Smalbrugge Martin, Uijen Annemarie A, van der Horst Henriëtte E, Maarsingh Otto R
Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam and Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec 26;75(750):e12-e19. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0099. Print 2025 Jan.
Personal continuity is an important dimension of continuity of care in general practice and is associated with many benefits including a higher quality of GP care and lower mortality rate. Over time, changes in society and health care have challenged the provision of personal continuity. Older patients in particular experience more negative consequences from receiving discontinuous care.
To explore the perspectives of GPs, older patients, practice nurses, and assistants on improving personal continuity in general practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that affect this improvement process.
A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted from May to August 2019.
We organised four focus groups: two with GPs ( = 17), one with patients ( = 7), and one with practice assistants ( = 4) and practice nurses ( = 2). Focus groups were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Personal continuity was viewed as being provided by the entire general practice team and not just by the patient's own GP. It was suggested that investing in team communication and stability (for example, by efficient use of the electronic health records) and retaining the availability and accessibility of the patient's own GP for patient care, especially for frail older persons, (for example, by delegating tasks) could improve personal continuity. Barriers and facilitators were perceived at the individual (for example, GPs' involvement in tasks), organisation (for example, staff shortages), and societal level (for example, payment system).
As general practice moves towards a more team-based approach to ensure personal continuity, efforts to improve personal continuity should focus on supporting team-based provision of continuous care.
个人连续性是全科医疗中连续性照护的一个重要维度,与诸多益处相关,包括更高质量的全科医生照护和更低的死亡率。随着时间推移,社会和医疗保健的变化对个人连续性的提供提出了挑战。尤其是老年患者,在接受间断性照护时会经历更多负面后果。
探讨全科医生、老年患者、执业护士和助理对于改善全科医疗中个人连续性的看法,并确定影响这一改善过程的障碍和促进因素。
2019年5月至8月进行了一项采用焦点小组的定性研究。
我们组织了四个焦点小组:两个由全科医生组成(共17人),一个由患者组成(共7人),一个由执业助理(共4人)和执业护士(共2人)组成。使用反思性主题分析法对焦点小组进行分析。
个人连续性被视为由整个全科医疗团队提供,而不仅仅是患者自己的全科医生。有人建议,投资于团队沟通和稳定性(例如,通过有效使用电子健康记录),并保持患者自己的全科医生可随时为患者提供照护,特别是对体弱的老年人(例如,通过任务委派),可以改善个人连续性。在个人层面(例如,全科医生参与任务)、组织层面(例如,人员短缺)和社会层面(例如,支付系统)都发现了障碍和促进因素。
随着全科医疗朝着更基于团队的方式发展以确保个人连续性,改善个人连续性的努力应侧重于支持基于团队的连续性照护提供。