• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的全国数据退出选项:健康数据研究的趋势及潜在后果

NHS national data opt-outs: trends and potential consequences for health data research.

作者信息

Tazare John, Henderson Alasdair D, Morley Jessica, Blake Helen A, McDonald Helen I, Williamson Elizabeth J, Strongman Helen

机构信息

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0020. Print 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0020
PMID:38438199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523503/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The English NHS data opt-out allows people to prevent use of their health data for purposes other than direct care. In 2021, the number of opt-outs increased in response to government-led proposals to create a centralised pseudonymised primary care record database.

AIM

To describe the potential impact of NHS national data opt-outs in 2021 on health data research.

DESIGN & SETTING: We conducted a descriptive analysis of opt-outs using publicly available data and the potential consequences on research are discussed.

METHOD

Trends in opt-outs in England were described by age, sex, and region. Using a hypothetical study, we explored statistical and epidemiological implications of opt-outs.

RESULTS

During the lead up to a key government-led deadline for registering opt-outs (from 31 May 2021-30 June 2021), 1 339 862 national data opt-outs were recorded; increasing the percentage of opt-outs in England from 2.77% to 4.97% of the population. Among females, percentage opt-outs increased by 83% (from 3.02% to 5.53%) compared with 76% in males (from 2.51% to 4.41%). Across age groups, the highest relative increase was among people aged 40-49 years, which rose from 2.89% to 6.04%. Considerable geographical variation was not clearly related to deprivation. Key research consequences of opt-outs include reductions in sample size and unpredictable distortion of observed measures of the frequency of health events or associations between these events.

CONCLUSION

Opt-out rates varied by age, sex, and place. The impact of this and variation by other characteristics on research is not quantifiable. Potential effects of opt-outs on research and consequences for health policies based on this research must be considered when creating future opt-out solutions.

摘要

背景

英国国民健康服务(NHS)数据退出机制允许人们阻止其健康数据被用于直接护理以外的目的。2021年,随着政府主导的创建集中式假名初级保健记录数据库提案的提出,选择退出的人数有所增加。

目的

描述2021年NHS全国数据退出机制对健康数据研究的潜在影响。

设计与背景

我们使用公开可用数据对退出情况进行了描述性分析,并讨论了对研究的潜在影响。

方法

按年龄、性别和地区描述了英格兰退出情况的趋势。通过一项假设研究,我们探讨了退出机制在统计学和流行病学方面的影响。

结果

在政府主导的关键退出登记截止日期之前(2021年5月31日至2021年6月30日),记录了1339862例全国数据退出;使英格兰退出人口的比例从2.77%增至4.97%。在女性中,退出比例增加了83%(从3.02%增至5.53%),而男性增加了76%(从2.51%增至4.41%)。在各年龄组中,40至49岁人群的相对增幅最高,从2.89%升至6.04%。显著的地理差异与贫困状况没有明显关联。退出机制对研究的关键影响包括样本量减少以及健康事件发生频率或这些事件之间关联的观察指标出现不可预测的偏差。

结论

退出率因年龄、性别和地点而异。这一点以及其他特征的差异对研究的影响无法量化。在制定未来的退出解决方案时,必须考虑退出机制对研究的潜在影响以及基于此项研究的健康政策后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/110a1ac6ed07/BJGPO.2024.0020-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/4882d324d4ad/BJGPO.2024.0020-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/e09198756571/BJGPO.2024.0020-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/112be798b311/BJGPO.2024.0020-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/714b1fa43d67/BJGPO.2024.0020-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/110a1ac6ed07/BJGPO.2024.0020-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/4882d324d4ad/BJGPO.2024.0020-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/e09198756571/BJGPO.2024.0020-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/112be798b311/BJGPO.2024.0020-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/714b1fa43d67/BJGPO.2024.0020-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2e/11523503/110a1ac6ed07/BJGPO.2024.0020-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
NHS national data opt-outs: trends and potential consequences for health data research.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的全国数据退出选项:健康数据研究的趋势及潜在后果
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0020. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Perceptions of anonymised data use and awareness of the NHS data opt-out amongst patients, carers and healthcare staff.患者、护理人员和医护人员对匿名数据使用的认知以及对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)数据退出选项的了解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00281-2.
3
Medicare Opt-Out Trends Among Dermatologists May Reflect Systemic Health Policy: Cross-sectional Analysis.皮肤科医生中医疗保险选择退出趋势可能反映系统性健康政策:横断面分析
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Nov 8;5(4):e42345. doi: 10.2196/42345.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Willingness of children and adolescents to have a COVID-19 vaccination: Results of a large whole schools survey in England.儿童和青少年接种新冠疫苗的意愿:英格兰一项大规模全学校调查的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct;40:101144. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101144. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Empirical evidence on the demand for carve-outs in employment group mental health coverage.关于就业群体心理健康保险中独立分拆保险需求的实证证据。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000 Jun 1;3(2):83-95. doi: 10.1002/1099-176x(200006)3:2<83::aid-mhp81>3.0.co;2-f.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review.知情选择同意和退出同意程序在科研中对常规记录健康数据的再利用及其对同意率和同意偏倚的影响:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e42131. doi: 10.2196/42131.
10
'It's like being conscripted, one volunteer is better than 10 pressed men': A qualitative study into the views of people who plan to opt-out of organ donation.“这就像被征召入伍一样,一个自愿者比 10 个被迫入伍的人要好”:对计划选择退出器官捐献的人的观点的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):257-274. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12406. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in understanding inequities in help-seeking for possible cancer symptoms.理解在寻求针对可能的癌症症状的帮助方面存在的不平等现象所面临的挑战。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;2(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00082-1.

本文引用的文献

1
How Palantir is strengthening its hold on NHS patient data.帕兰提尔公司如何加强对英国国家医疗服务体系患者数据的掌控。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 30;381:p1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1501.
2
Completeness, agreement, and representativeness of ethnicity recording in the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).英国临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)和相关的医院入院统计(HES)中种族记录的完整性、一致性和代表性。
Popul Health Metr. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12963-023-00302-0.
3
Completeness and representativeness of small area socioeconomic data linked with the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
与英国临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)相关的小区域社会经济数据的完整性和代表性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Jul 28;76(10):880-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219200.
4
Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK.关于未经明确同意就分享医疗服务数据用于临床和研究目的的公众意见:英国的一项匿名在线调查
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 27;12(4):e057579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579.
5
Risks of covid-19 hospital admission and death for people with learning disability: population based cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.学习障碍人群因新冠病毒感染住院和死亡的风险:利用 OpenSAFELY 平台开展的基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 14;374:n1592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1592.
6
Patient trust in plans to share primary care data.患者对共享初级保健数据计划的信任。
BMJ. 2021 Jun 4;373:n1413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1413.
7
Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity.撞击器偏差破坏了我们对 COVID-19 疾病风险和严重程度的理解。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 12;11(1):5749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2.
8
The use of UK primary care databases in health technology assessments carried out by the National Institute for health and care excellence (NICE).英国初级医疗数据库在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)开展的卫生技术评估中的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05529-3.
9
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
10
Health indicator recording in UK primary care electronic health records: key implications for handling missing data.英国初级医疗电子健康记录中的健康指标记录:处理缺失数据的关键影响
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 11;11:157-167. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S191437. eCollection 2019.