Sahragard Ali, Dvořák Miloš, Pagan-Galbarro Carlos, Carrasco-Correa Enrique Javier, Kubáň Pavel, Miró Manuel
FI-TRACE Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of the Balearic Islands, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7.5, E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Veveří 97, CZ-60200, Brno, Czech Republic.
Anal Chim Acta. 2024 Apr 8;1297:342362. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342362. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
There is a quest of novel functional and reliable platforms for enhancing the efficiency of microextraction approaches in troublesome matrices, such as industrial wastewaters. 3D printing has been proven superb in the analytical field to act as the springboard of microscale extraction approaches.
In this work, low-force stereolithography (SL) was exploited for 3D printing and prototyping bespoke fluidic devices for accommodating nonsupported microelectromembrane extraction (μEME). The analytical performance of 3D-printed μEME devices with distinct cross-sections, including square, circle, and obround, and various channel dimensions was explored against that of commonly used circular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubing in flow injection systems. A computer-controlled millifluidic system was harnessed for the (i) automatic liquid-handling of minute volumes of donor, acceptor, and organic phases at the low μL level that spanned from 3 to 44 μL in this work, (ii) formation of three-phase μEME, (iii) in-line extraction, (iv) flow-through optical detection of the acceptor phase, and (v) solvent removal and regeneration of the μEME device and fluidic lines. Using methylene blue (MB) as a model analyte, experimental results evinced that the 3D-printed channels with an obround cross-section (2.5 mm × 2.5 mm) were the most efficient in terms of absolute extraction recovery (59%), as compared to PTFE tubing of 2.5 mm inner diameter (27%). This is attributed to the distinctive convex interface of the organic phase (1-octanol), with a more pronounced laminar pattern, in 3D-printed SL methacrylate-based fluidic channels against that of PTFE tubing on account of the enhanced 1-octanol wettability and lower contact angles for the 3D-printed devices. The devices with obround channels were leveraged for the automatic μEME and in-line clean-up of MB in high matrix textile dyeing wastewater samples with relative recoveries ≥81%, RSD% ≤ 17.1% and LOD of 1.3 mg L. The 3D-printed nonsupported μEME device was proven superb for the analysis of wastewater samples with an elevated ionic strength (0.7 mol L NaCl, 5000 mg L NaCO, and 0.013 mol L NaOH) with recorded electric currents below 12 μA.
The coupling of 3D printing with nonsupported μEME in automatic flow-based systems is herein proposed for the first time and demonstrated for the clean-up of troublesome samples, such as wastewaters.
人们一直在寻求新型的功能强大且可靠的平台,以提高在棘手基质(如工业废水)中微萃取方法的效率。3D打印在分析领域已被证明是微尺度萃取方法的理想跳板。
在这项工作中,采用低力立体光刻(SL)技术进行3D打印和定制流体装置的原型制作,以用于非支撑微电膜萃取(μEME)。针对流动注射系统中常用的圆形聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)管,研究了具有不同横截面(包括方形、圆形和椭圆形)以及各种通道尺寸的3D打印μEME装置的分析性能。利用计算机控制的微流体系统进行(i)自动处理低至微升水平(本工作中为3至44微升)的微量供体、受体和有机相液体,(ii)形成三相μEME,(iii)在线萃取,(iv)受体相的流通式光学检测,以及(v)μEME装置和流体管路的溶剂去除和再生。以亚甲基蓝(MB)作为模型分析物,实验结果表明,与内径为2.5毫米的PTFE管(27%)相比,具有椭圆形横截面(2.5毫米×2.5毫米)的3D打印通道在绝对萃取回收率(59%)方面最为高效。这归因于基于3D打印的SL甲基丙烯酸酯类流体通道中有机相(1 - 辛醇)独特的凸形界面,其层流模式更为明显,而PTFE管则不然,这是由于3D打印装置的1 - 辛醇润湿性增强且接触角更低。具有椭圆形通道的装置用于高基质纺织印染废水样品中MB的自动μEME和在线净化,相对回收率≥81%,相对标准偏差(RSD%)≤17.1%,检测限为1.3毫克/升。经证明,3D打印的非支撑μEME装置对于分析离子强度较高(0.7摩尔/升NaCl、5000毫克/升Na₂CO₃和0.013摩尔/升NaOH)的废水样品非常出色,记录的电流低于12微安。
本文首次提出在基于流动的自动系统中将3D打印与非支撑μEME相结合,并展示了其对棘手样品(如废水)的净化效果。